Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Prisoners′ rights [1] Constitutional principle [ 2 ] R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms [1999] UKHL 33 is a UK constitutional law case, concerning parliamentary sovereignty .
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Northumbria Police Authority [1989] 1 QB 26 was an English administrative law decision that first recognised the prerogative power to do whatever "was necessary to meet either an actual or an apprehended threat to the peace".
[1]: 31 When Limbuela's application for judicial review was heard he had already been forced to sleep rough for two days and beg for food due to the lack of state support. Other evidence of destitution presented to the hearing judge included a series of medical complaints from which Limbuela was suffering that were exacerbated by Secretary of ...
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union [1995] UKHL 3 is a House of Lords case concerning the awarding of compensation under the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme. The case is considered significant in constitutional terms for its ruling on the extent of ministerial prerogative powers.
[2009] UKHL 10: 18 February 2009: R (on the application of Ahmad) (Respondent) v Mayor and Burgesses of London Borough of Newham (Appellants) [2009] UKHL 14: 4 March 2009: R (On The Application of Black) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for Justice (Appellant) [2009] UKHL 1: 21 January 2009
The applicants relied on Lord Slynn′s statement as to what represented the law in R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, ex parte A (1999). [10] The CICB case engendered the following prerequisites for a finding of unfairness: [11]
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Venables and Thompson [1997] UKHL 25 is a UK constitutional law case, concerning the exercise of independent judgement in judicial review. Facts
As Lord Hoffmann explained in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Simms [2000] 2 AC 115, 131, "the principle of legality means that Parliament must squarely confront what it is doing and accept the political cost", and so "[f]undamental rights cannot be overridden by general … words" in a statute, "because there is too great ...