Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This is a list of the substantive decisions of the Court of Appeal of New Zealand. It is organised in order of the year the case was handed down. It is organised in order of the year the case was handed down.
The couple have two children who were born in New Zealand but are not entitled to New Zealand citizenship. [6] After being arrested, Teitiota applied for refugee or protected person status, which was declined by an immigration official. [7] Teitiota appealed the decision of the immigration official to the Immigration and Protection Tribunal,
The judiciary of New Zealand is responsible for the system of courts that interprets and applies the laws of New Zealand.It has four primary functions: to provide a mechanism for dispute resolution; to deliver authoritative rulings on the meaning and application of legislation; to develop case law; and to uphold the rule of law, personal liberty and human rights. [1]
Mafart and Prieur v Television New Zealand Ltd; Eastern Services Ltd v No 68 Ltd; C v Complaints Assessment Committee; Condon v R; Shirley v Wairarapa District Health Board; Steele and Roberts v Serepisos; Chirnside v Fay; Chamberlains v Lai; Secretary for Justice (as the New Zealand Central Authority on behalf of T J) v H; Henkel KgaA v ...
The Immigration and Protection Tribunal is a specialist, independent tribunal established in New Zealand under the Immigration Act 2009 with jurisdiction to hear appeals and applications regarding residence class visas, deportation, and claims to be recognised as a refugee or as a protected person.
Depending on the court specified in the |court= parameter, it causes {{Infobox court case}} to display either the coat of arms of the court or, if this is unavailable, a photograph of the court. Only images that have been released to Wikipedia under a free licence should be used here.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
Saunders & Co v Bank of New Zealand; Saunderson v Purchase; Schmidt v Holland; Seales v Attorney-General; Shivas v Bank of New Zealand; Shotter v Westpac Banking Corp; Slater Wilmhurst Ltd v Crown Group Custodian Ltd; Soccer Nelson Inc v Soccer NZ Inc; Stringer v Peat Marwick Mitchell & Co