Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Supreme Court of Mauritius is the highest court of Mauritius and the final court of appeal in the Mauritian judicial system. It was established in its current form in 1850, replacing the Cour d'Appel established in 1808 during the French administration [ 1 ] and has a permanent seat in Port Louis .
Supreme Court of Mauritania Mauritius: Supreme Court of Mauritius: By the President, after consultation with the Prime Minister: 67 17 Judicial Committee of the Privy Council Mexico: Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation: 15 11 Micronesia: Supreme Court of the Federated States of Micronesia Moldova: Constitutional Court of Moldova
India's Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) was the first experiment in tribunalization in the history of India. It was set up on 25 January 1941 by virtue of section 5A of the Income Tax Act, 1922. It was set up on 25 January 1941 by virtue of section 5A of the Income Tax Act, 1922.
The Constitution of Mauritius is the supreme legal document of the country. The final appeal from decisions of the Court of Appeal of Mauritius to the Judicial Committee of the Privy council in London as provided for under the Constitution of Mauritius. [1] [2] As of 2014, a total of 8,594 cases were pending before the Supreme Court of Mauritius.
CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd v. Antrix Corp. Ltd. is a case currently pending before the Supreme Court of the United States. The case concerns the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and personal jurisdiction. [1] [2] The case has not yet been set for argument as of October 10, 2024. [3]
A British court acting as the final court of appeal for Mauritius ruled on Monday that the 2019 election of Prime Minister Pravind Jugnauth was invalid, upholding an appeal by an opposition ...
At the age of 44 in 1976 and following his father's footsteps he became a Supreme Court judge. In 1982 he became Senior Puisne Judge . Eventually in 1988 in addition to be named Queen's Counsel (QC), Victor Glover was also promoted to the position of Chief Justice in succession to Sir Cassam Moollan who had retired.
The Supreme Court of Mauritius held that the Minister’s actions, because of short notice, did violate the right to equality in the Constitution ss 1 and 3 (protection of the law, and other rights and freedoms), having regard to the Declaration of the Rights of Man 1793 and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, art 26 ...