Ad
related to: connecticut housing court casescourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
- County Court Records
Easily Search Court Records Online
Just Enter A Name & Choose A State
- Criminal Court Records
See If Anyone Has Been To Court
Browse Up To Date Court Records
- State Court Record Search
Search Our Database For Court Info
Answer Your Burning Questions Now!
- Court Case Records
Get Info On Any Public Court Case
Reveal Incriminating Details Today!
- County Court Records
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), [1] was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another private owner to further economic development does not violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
The court has four trial divisions: civil, criminal, family, and housing. [1] The housing division is located in the Bridgeport, Hartford, New Haven, Stamford-Norwalk, and Waterbury judicial districts, in all other judicial districts the cases of the housing division are heard in the civil division.
The Connecticut Supreme Court case stemmed from a suit brought by the Boston Globe, Hartford Courant, The New York Times and The Washington Post in 2002. On October 5, 2009, the United States Supreme Court rejected a request by the diocese for the court to stay or reconsider the Connecticut opinion ordering the release of the documents. [62]
In state housing court, Judge Timothy F. Sullivan found Eresian in contempt of court for failing to pay $2,850 in damages to a tenant whom he allegedly locked out of an apartment without a proper ...
Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp, 429 U.S. 252 (1977), was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States dealing with a zoning ordinance that in a practical way barred families of various socio-economic, and ethno-racial backgrounds from residing in a neighborhood. The Court held that the ordinance ...
Engblom v. Carey, 677 F.2d 957 (2d Cir. 1982), is a landmark decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit interpreting the Third Amendment to the United States Constitution for the first time.
Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986) Set the standard for what parties must establish in evidence to be granted summary judgement in federal civil cases and how courts should evaluate those motions. Since such motions are extremely common, Anderson has become the most-cited Supreme Court case. Daubert v.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Ad
related to: connecticut housing court casescourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month