enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Warren v. District of Columbia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia

    The trial judges held that the police were under no specific legal duty to provide protection to the individual plaintiffs and dismissed the complaints. In a 2–1 decision, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals determined that Warren, Taliaferro, and Nichol were owed a special duty of care by the police department and reversed the trial ...

  3. Duty to rescue - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_to_rescue

    t. e. A duty to rescue is a concept in tort law and criminal law that arises in a number of cases, describing a circumstance in which a party can be held liable for failing to come to the rescue of another party who could face potential injury or death without being rescued. The exact extent of the duty varies greatly between different ...

  4. Rescue doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rescue_doctrine

    The rescue doctrine was established nineteen years later, in the landmark case of Cote v. Palmer. [ 4 ] Essentially, the rescue doctrine means that the rescuer can recover damages from a defendant when the rescuer is injured rescuing someone. The defendant is usually negligent in causing the accident to occur.

  5. Scott v. Harris - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_v._Harris

    Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving a lawsuit against a sheriff's deputy brought by a motorist who was paralyzed after the officer ran his eluding vehicle off the road during a high-speed car chase. [1] The driver contended that this action was an unreasonable seizure under ...

  6. Plumhoff v. Rickard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plumhoff_v._Rickard

    Plumhoff v. Rickard, 572 U.S. 765 (2014), is a United States Supreme Court case involving the use of force by police officers during high-speed car chases.After first holding that it had jurisdiction to hear the case, the Court held that the conduct of the police officers involved in the case did not violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits unreasonable searches ...

  7. Fireman's rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fireman's_rule

    The fireman's rule (firefighter's rule) is a common law or statutory restriction on tort actions by public safety officials. In general, the fireman's rule bars lawsuits by firefighters, police officers and, in some jurisdictions, all government safety professionals from collecting on damages that occur in the course of their duties even in cases of clear negligence by other parties.

  8. List of law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_law_enforcement...

    The FBI reported that in 2011, "69 law enforcement officers from around the nation were killed in the line of duty, while another 53 officers died in accidents while performing their duties." [6](released November 19, 2012) NBC News reported 165 dead. [7] 2012.

  9. Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palsgraf_v._Long_Island...

    Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99 (1928), is a leading case in American tort law on the question of liability to an unforeseeable plaintiff.The case was heard by the New York Court of Appeals, the highest state court in New York; its opinion was written by Chief Judge Benjamin Cardozo, a leading figure in the development of American common law and later a United ...