Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Tathagata both exists and does not exist after death. The Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist after death. In the Aggi-Vacchagotta Sutta , [ 6 ] "Discourse to Vatsagotra on the [Simile of] Fire," Majjhima Nikaya 72, [ web 3 ] the Buddha is questioned by Vatsagotra on the "ten indeterminate question:" [ 5 ] avyākrta [ 4 ]
Noneism, in this context, holds that some things do not exist or have no being. [5] There are a few controversial entities in philosophy that, according to noneism philosophy, do not exist: past and future entities, which entails any entity that no longer exists or will exist in the future; people or living things that are deceased; unactualized possibila, which are objects that have the ...
The answer to this question depends on the definition of sound. We can define sound as our perception of air vibrations. Therefore, sound does not exist if we do not hear it. When a tree falls, the motion disturbs the air and sends off air waves.
If we are, when asked what is beyond the horizon of the known, we must say that we do not know. In 1885, Ingersoll explained his comparative view of agnosticism and atheism as follows: [71] The Agnostic is an Atheist. The Atheist is an Agnostic. The Agnostic says, 'I do not know, but I do not believe there is any God.' The Atheist says the same.
The answer is that St. Thomas recognised instantly, what so many modern sceptics have begun to suspect rather laboriously; that a man must either answer that question in the affirmative, or else never answer any question, never ask any question, never even exist intellectually, to answer or to ask.
The whole point of Russell's paradox is that the answer "such a set does not exist" means the definition of the notion of set within a given theory is unsatisfactory. Note the difference between the statements "such a set does not exist" and "it is an empty set". It is like the difference between saying "There is no bucket" and saying "The ...
Moral nihilism (also called ethical nihilism) is the meta-ethical view that nothing is morally right or morally wrong and that morality does not exist. [1] [2] Moral nihilism is distinct from moral relativism, which allows for actions to be wrong relative to a particular culture or individual.
In computability theory, an undecidable problem is a decision problem for which an effective method (algorithm) to derive the correct answer does not exist. More formally, an undecidable problem is a problem whose language is not a recursive set; see the article Decidable language.