Ads
related to: peer evaluation comment examples pdf format template editablepeer-review-feedback-form.pdffiller.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month
A Must Have in your Arsenal - cmscritic
- Online Document Editor
Upload & Edit any PDF Form Online.
No Installation Needed. Try Now!
- Type Text in PDF Online
Upload & Type on PDF Files Online.
No Installation Needed. Try Now!
- Convert PDF to Word
Convert PDF to Editable Online.
No Installation Needed. Try Now!
- Write Text in PDF Online
Upload & Write on PDF Forms Online.
No Installation Needed. Try Now!
- Online Document Editor
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The template dislays differently when included on a main vs talkpage (see examples below) and for whether the article was adapted from wikipedia initially or written from scratch in the journal . It also adds the article to Category:Wikipedia articles published in peer-reviewed literature .
To request a Peer review, edit the article talk page, add {} to the top of the page, and save the page. This will create this template ({{Peer review}}) with a link to a new peer review page for the article. Follow this link, and add your request in the edit box as instructed.
Now you just need to say why you want a peer review. To complete the process, just note in the edit box below the kind of suggestions, comments and contributions you want, and/or the sections of the article you think need reviewing.
Editors request a peer review by putting {} onto an article's talk page. The template displays a choice of topics for the review which the user can choose from. Clicking on a topic will create a new page for the review. The new page is preloaded based on the article's topic from templates {{Peer review/preload1}} to {{Peer review/preload10}}
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
For information on what templates are, and how the template namespace is intended to be used, see WP:Template namespace. For information on template use and development, see Help:Template. For the project team looking after templates on Wikipedia, see WP:WikiProject Templates. For navigation templates rather than notices, see WP:Navigation ...
For example, the European Accounting Review editors subject each manuscript to three questions to decide whether a manuscript moves forward to referees: 1) Is the article a fit for the journal's aims and scope, 2) is the paper content (e.g. literature review, methods, conclusions) sufficient and does the paper make a worthwhile contribution to ...
Due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning. Wikipedia:Peer review is the process designed to provide detailed comments.