enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Open-source voting system - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_voting_system

    The Los Angeles attempt at open source voting was dismissed by Open Source Initiative as a failed project when it did not meet accepted open source standards. A condition of the Secretary of State's approval was to open-source the code by October 1, 2021, [ 17 ] but had not met that commitment as of February 2022.

  3. Helios Voting - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helios_Voting

    Helios Voting is an open-source, web-based electronic voting system. Users can vote in elections and users can create elections. Users can vote in elections and users can create elections. Anyone can cast a ballot; however, for the final vote to be counted, the voter's identification must be verified.

  4. Open Voting Consortium - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Voting_Consortium

    The Open Voting Consortium (OVC) is a non-profit advocacy group dedicated to the development, maintenance, and delivery of trustable and open voting systems for use in public elections. OVC was founded in December 12, 2003 by Alan Dechert, Dr. Arthur Keller and computer science professor Dr. Doug Jones. [ 1 ]

  5. Punchscan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punchscan

    The system is voter-verifiable, provides an end-to-end (E2E) audit mechanism, and issues a ballot receipt to each voter. The system won grand prize at the 2007 University Voting Systems Competition. The computer software which Punchscan incorporates is open-source; the source code was released on 2 November 2006 under a revised BSD licence. [1]

  6. Electronic voting in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_voting_in_the...

    When scanners use the bar code or QR code, the candidates are represented in the bar code or QR code as numbers, and the scanner counts those codes, not the names. If a bug or hack makes the numbering system in the ballot marking device different from the numbering system in the scanner, votes will be tallied for the wrong candidates. [11]

  7. End-to-end auditable voting - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End-to-end_auditable_voting

    End-to-end auditable or end-to-end voter verifiable (E2E) systems are voting systems with stringent integrity properties and strong tamper resistance.E2E systems use cryptographic techniques to provide voters with receipts that allow them to verify their votes were counted as cast, without revealing which candidates a voter supported to an external party.

  8. Instant-runoff voting - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting

    Unlike a plurality vote system where votes are non-transferable, instant-runoff voting also avoids some kinds of vote-splitting by near-identical (clone) candidates. Edward J. Nanson, while noting Condorcet's objection to IRV, said the method is "a perfectly feasible and practicable one for elections on any scale."

  9. Open vote network - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_vote_network

    A straightforward application of OV-net is to build a boardroom voting system, where the election is run by voters themselves. For a single candidate election, each voter sends either "No" or "Yes", which correspond to 0 and 1. Every voter, as well as an observer, can tally the "Yes" votes by themselves without needing any tallying authority.