Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
{{is leap year|year}} year defaults to {{CURRENTYEAR}} (2025). It must be specified in the Gregorian calendar, extended to all epochs using linear year numbering: use the proleptic Gregorian calendar in Christian Era before the change, and the astronomical year convention (using negative numbers, and year 0) in all years BC before the Christian era (there's a difference of 1 in absolute value).
It must be specified in the Gregorian calendar, extended to all epochs using linear year numbering: use the proleptic Gregorian calendar in Christian Era before the change, and the astronomical year convention (using negative numbers, and year 0) in all years BC before the Christian era (there's a difference of 1 in absolute value).
On a non-Leap Year, some leapers choose to celebrate the big day on Feb. 28. Some choose to celebrate on March 1. Some even choose both days or claim the whole month of February to celebrate.
If a year is divisible by 100 but not divisible by 400, we skip the leap year. For example, 2000 was a leap year but 1700, 1800, and 1900 were not. The next skipped leap year will be in 2100.
A leap year is a year in which an extra day, Feb. 29, is added to the calendar. It's called an intercalary day. It occurs about every four years, but there are exceptions (we'll get to that later
{{IsLeapYear|year}} year defaults to {{CURRENTYEAR}} (2024). It must be specified in the Gregorian calendar, extended to all epochs using linear year numbering: use the proleptic Gregorian calendar in Christian Era before the change, and the astronomical year convention (using negative numbers, and year 0) in all years BC before the Christian era (there's a difference of 1 in absolute value).
Let's not fight over templates. If someone wants to create an alternate version, they should make a new template with a new name. If it's good, other contributors will incorporate it. More to the point, this is integer arithmetic, so I don't see any need for rounding. I hope we don't have to have this template protected to stop an edit war.
Lotus 1-2-3 assumes that 1900 is a leap year. This is incorrect as while 1900 is a year that is divisible by four, years divisible by 100 are not counted as leap years unless divisible by 400. [ 90 ] This bug persists today as its competitor, Microsoft Excel, still incorporates the bug to ensure compatibility with legacy Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheets.