enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. GF (2) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GF(2)

    every element x of GF(2) satisfies x + x = 0 and therefore −x = x; this means that the characteristic of GF(2) is 2; every element x of GF(2) satisfies x 2 = x (i.e. is idempotent with respect to multiplication); this is an instance of Fermat's little theorem. GF(2) is the only field with this property (Proof: if x 2 = x, then either x = 0 or ...

  3. Fermat's theorem on sums of two squares - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat's_theorem_on_sums_of...

    On the other hand, the primes 3, 7, 11, 19, 23 and 31 are all congruent to 3 modulo 4, and none of them can be expressed as the sum of two squares. This is the easier part of the theorem, and follows immediately from the observation that all squares are congruent to 0 (if number squared is even) or 1 (if number squared is odd) modulo 4.

  4. Fermat number - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_number

    If 2 k + 1 is prime and k > 0, then k itself must be a power of 2, [1] so 2 k + 1 is a Fermat number; such primes are called Fermat primes. As of 2023 [update] , the only known Fermat primes are F 0 = 3 , F 1 = 5 , F 2 = 17 , F 3 = 257 , and F 4 = 65537 (sequence A019434 in the OEIS ).

  5. Fermat's Last Theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat's_Last_Theorem

    In number theory, Fermat's Last Theorem (sometimes called Fermat's conjecture, especially in older texts) states that no three positive integers a, b, and c satisfy the equation a n + b n = c n for any integer value of n greater than 2. The cases n = 1 and n = 2 have been known since antiquity to have infinitely many solutions. [1]

  6. Finite field - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite_field

    As 2 and 3 are coprime, the intersection of GF(4) and GF(8) in GF(64) is the prime field GF(2). The union of GF(4) and GF(8) has thus 10 elements. The remaining 54 elements of GF(64) generate GF(64) in the sense that no other subfield contains any of them. It follows that they are roots of irreducible polynomials of degree 6 over GF(2). This ...

  7. Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem for specific exponents

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_of_Fermat's_Last...

    (u 2 − v 2) 2 = w 4 − 16s 4. But as Fermat proved, there can be no integer solution to the equation x 4 − y 4 = z 2, of which this is a special case with z = u 2 − v 2, x = w and y = 2s. The first step of Fermat's proof is to factor the left-hand side [30] (x 2 + y 2)(x 2 − y 2) = z 2

  8. Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiles's_proof_of_Fermat's...

    Wiles had the insight that in many cases this ring homomorphism could be a ring isomorphism (Conjecture 2.16 in Chapter 2, §3 of the 1995 paper [4]). He realised that the map between R {\displaystyle R} and T {\displaystyle \mathbf {T} } is an isomorphism if and only if two abelian groups occurring in the theory are finite and have the same ...

  9. Interior extremum theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat's_stationary_point...

    In mathematics, the interior extremum theorem, also known as Fermat's theorem, is a theorem which states that at the local extrema of a differentiable function, its derivative is always zero. It belongs to the mathematical field of real analysis and is named after French mathematician Pierre de Fermat .