Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
An Inconvenient Truth is a 2006 American documentary film directed by Davis Guggenheim about former vice president of the United States Al Gore's campaign to educate people about global warming. The film features a slide show that, by Gore's own estimate, he has presented over 1,000 times to audiences worldwide.
On a scale of 1 out of 7, where higher numbers indicated greater disagreement, "global warming is already underway" had a mean rating of 3.4, and "global warming will occur in the future" had an even greater agreement of 2.6 Surveyed scientists had less confidence in the accuracy of contemporary climate models, rating their ability to make ...
An Inconvenient Truth: The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and What We Can Do About It is a 2006 book by Al Gore released in conjunction with the film An Inconvenient Truth. It is published by Rodale Press in Emmaus, Pennsylvania, in the United States. [1] The sequel is Our Choice: A Plan to Solve the Climate Crisis (2009). [2]
But Goessling points to a third, more alarming factor: global warming itself. Low-level clouds tend to thrive in a cool and moist lower atmosphere. As the planet’s surface heats up, this can ...
Among global worries, pollution was ranked second at 36% and terrorism third at 31%. ... corruption and poor living standards are all windows on an alarming truth about how the powerful have ...
An Inconsistent Truth is Valentine's investigation into man-made global warming.The title alludes to Al Gore's documentary An Inconvenient Truth.Valentine talks with scientists and politicians who reject the scientific consensus on climate change, and explores the culture of the global warming movement; often in a satirical way.
They also could pose a threat to international ambitions to fight global warming by hindering one of the leading forms of existing clean power. INSIGHT-Inconvenient truth: Droughts shrink ...
Climate change denial (also global warming denial) is a form of science denial characterized by rejecting, refusing to acknowledge, disputing, or fighting the scientific consensus on climate change. Those promoting denial commonly use rhetorical tactics to give the appearance of a scientific controversy where there is none. [4]