Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The differential susceptibility theory proposed by Jay Belsky [1] is another interpretation of psychological findings that are usually discussed according to the diathesis-stress model. Both models suggest that people's development and emotional affect are differentially affected by experiences or qualities of the environment. Where the ...
Differential susceptibility, proposed by Jay Belsky, brings the differential responses to both positive and negative experiences together in one single model. Grounded in evolutionary theory, Belsky and colleagues sought to understand why and how children differ so fundamentally in their developmental response to external influences, with some ...
However, the differential susceptibility theory (DST) [7] [8] and biological sensitivity to context theory (BSCT) [9] and sensory processing sensitivity (SPS) [27] suggest increased plasticity in terms of responsiveness to both positive and negative influences; and the vantage sensitivity (VS) concept emphasizes increased responsiveness to ...
Schematic of diathesis–stress model. The diathesis-stress model, also known as the vulnerability–stress model, is a psychological theory that attempts to explain a disorder, or its trajectory, as the result of an interaction between a predispositional vulnerability, the diathesis, and stress caused by life experiences.
According to vantage sensitivity theory, people who benefit from positive experiences display vantage sensitivity as a function of vantage sensitivity factors (i.e., genetic, physiological, or psychological traits) whereas those who benefit less show vantage resistance due to the presence of vantage resistance factors (or the absence of vantage ...
Differential susceptibility; V. Vantage sensitivity This page was last edited on 15 November 2022, at 15:33 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons ...
Pages for logged out editors learn more. Contributions; Talk; Differential susceptibility hypothesis
The core constructs of Ecosocial Theory are: Embodiment; Pathways to Embodiment; the cumulative interplay between exposure, resistance, and susceptibility; and agency and accountability. [2] [3] Further, the theory specifies that all constructs must be considered in concert, as they work together in a synergistic explanation of disease ...