Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Cariou v. Prince, 714 F.3d 694 (2d Cir. 2013) [1] is a copyright case of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, on the question of whether artist Richard Prince's appropriation art treatment of Patrick Cariou's photographs was copyright infringement or fair use. [2]
Rogers v. Koons, 960 F.2d 301 (2d Cir. 1992), [1] is a leading U.S. court case on copyright, dealing with the fair use defense for parody. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit found that an artist copying a photograph could be liable for infringement when there was no clear need to imitate the photograph for parody.
Tushnet, nevertheless, found Kaplan's formulation problematic, particularly his point that in visual art the idea/expression divide often breaks down and becomes one and the same. "This analysis would seem to defeat copyright protection for photographs, since ideas are excluded by statute and policy from the subject matter of copyright," she ...
The family of the author whose story inspired the original Top Gun film is suing Paramount Pictures in hopes of grounding the sequel, Top Gun: Maverick, over copyright infringement. Shosh and ...
Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., 663 F. Supp. 706 (S.D.N.Y. 1987) was a federal case in which artist Saul Steinberg sued various parties involved with producing and promoting the 1984 movie Moscow on the Hudson, claiming that a promotional poster for the movie infringed his copyright in a magazine cover, View of the World from 9th Avenue, he ...
Timothy Burton Anderson, an author who wrote a script for the film Rocky IV, brought the suit for copyright infringement, unfair competition, unjust enrichment, and breach of confidence against Stallone, MGM, and other parties. Stallone et al. filed a motion for summary judgment which was granted in part and denied in part.
A Los Angeles artist, known for her creations with intricate patterns and bright colors, has filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against Shein, the multibillion-dollar Chinese-based online ...
Specifically following Bridgeman, the appeals court wrote, "In Bridgeman Art Library, the court examined whether color transparencies of public domain works of art were sufficiently original for copyright protection, ultimately holding that, as 'exact photographic copies of public domain works of art,' they were not."