Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
De Morgan's laws represented with Venn diagrams.In each case, the resultant set is the set of all points in any shade of blue. In propositional logic and Boolean algebra, De Morgan's laws, [1] [2] [3] also known as De Morgan's theorem, [4] are a pair of transformation rules that are both valid rules of inference.
De Morgan algebras are important for the study of the mathematical aspects of fuzzy logic. The standard fuzzy algebra F = ([0, 1], max( x , y ), min( x , y ), 0, 1, 1 − x ) is an example of a De Morgan algebra where the laws of excluded middle and noncontradiction do not hold.
This work summarized and extended the work of Boole, De Morgan, and Peirce, and was a comprehensive reference to symbolic logic as it was understood at the end of the ...
Augustus De Morgan (27 June 1806 – 18 March 1871) was a British mathematician and logician.He is best known for De Morgan's laws, relating logical conjunction, disjunction, and negation, and for coining the term "mathematical induction", the underlying principles of which he formalized. [1]
Suppose we are given that .Then we have by the law of excluded middle [clarification needed] (i.e. either must be true, or must not be true).. Subsequently, since , can be replaced by in the statement, and thus it follows that (i.e. either must be true, or must not be true).
To investigate the left distributivity of set subtraction over unions or intersections, consider how the sets involved in (both of) De Morgan's laws are all related: () = = () always holds (the equalities on the left and right are De Morgan's laws) but equality is not guaranteed in general (that is, the containment might be strict).
In logic, a rule of replacement [1] [2] [3] is a transformation rule that may be applied to only a particular segment of an expression.A logical system may be constructed so that it uses either axioms, rules of inference, or both as transformation rules for logical expressions in the system.
This equivalence can be established by applying De Morgan's laws twice to the fourth line of the above proof. The exclusive or is also equivalent to the negation of a logical biconditional , by the rules of material implication (a material conditional is equivalent to the disjunction of the negation of its antecedent and its consequence) and ...