Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
"Rescission" at common law. Rescission at common law (as distinct from rescission in equity) is a self-help remedy: historically, the common law courts simply gave effect to the rescinding party's unequivocal election to rescind the contract. Rescission at common law is only available for fraudulent misrepresentations and duress.
The Truth in Lending Act (TILA), or Regulation Z, is a federal law that protects you from unfair and predatory lending practices. Under TILA, you have the right to rescission. This is a consumer ...
The right of rescission is a legal protection under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) that allows you to cancel certain home financing agreements without any financial penalties.
The favorable and peaceable turn of affairs on the Mississippi rendered an immediate execution of that law unnecessary." [5] In keeping with his efforts to reduce the size of the debt, he left the funds for the ships unspent for over a year. Many other presidents have followed Jefferson's example.
A legal remedy, also referred to as judicial relief or a judicial remedy, is the means with which a court of law, usually in the exercise of civil law jurisdiction, enforces a right, imposes a penalty, or makes another court order to impose its will in order to compensate for the harm of a wrongful act inflicted upon an individual.
Rescission is the noun form of the verb "to rescind." It may refer to: Rescission (contract law) Rescission bill, a procedure to rescind previously appropriated funding in the United States; A synonym for repeal in parliamentary procedure; Several bills which have used the term in their names:
Injunctions in English law are a legal remedy of three types. Prohibitory injunctions prevent an individual or group from beginning or continuing actions which threaten or breach the legal rights of another. Mandatory injunctions are rarer and compel a person to carry out a certain act such as make restitution to an injured party.
Rescission Walker , 66 Mich. 568, 33 N.W. 919 (Mich. 1887), [ 1 ] was a case that has played an important role in the evolution of American contract law involving the doctrine of mutual mistake . One of the main issues in the case was whether the remedy of rescission is available if both parties to a contract share a misunderstanding about an ...