enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Clearing denominators - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clearing_denominators

    In mathematics, the method of clearing denominators, also called clearing fractions, is a technique for simplifying an equation equating two expressions that each are a sum of rational expressions – which includes simple fractions.

  3. Equating coefficients - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equating_coefficients

    The method of equating coefficients is often used when dealing with complex numbers. For example, to divide the complex number a + bi by the complex number c + di , we postulate that the ratio equals the complex number e+fi , and we wish to find the values of the parameters e and f for which this is true.

  4. Cross-multiplication - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-multiplication

    are solved using cross-multiplication, since the missing b term is implicitly equal to 1: =. Any equation containing fractions or rational expressions can be simplified by multiplying both sides by the least common denominator. This step is called clearing fractions.

  5. Descartes' rule of signs - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descartes'_rule_of_signs

    Theorem — The number of strictly positive roots (counting multiplicity) of is equal to the number of sign changes in the coefficients of , minus a nonnegative even number. If b 0 > 0 {\displaystyle b_{0}>0} , then we can divide the polynomial by x b 0 {\displaystyle x^{b_{0}}} , which would not change its number of strictly positive roots.

  6. Partial fraction decomposition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_fraction_decomposition

    The factor x 2 − 4x + 8 is irreducible over the reals, as its discriminant (−4) 2 − 4×8 = −16 is negative. Thus the partial fraction decomposition over the reals has the shape Thus the partial fraction decomposition over the reals has the shape

  7. Heaviside cover-up method - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaviside_cover-up_method

    D 1 is x + 1; set it equal to zero. This gives the residue for A when x = −1. Next, substitute this value of x into the fractional expression, but without D 1. Put this value down as the value of A. Proceed similarly for B and C. D 2 is x + 2; For the residue B use x = −2. D 3 is x + 3; For residue C use x = −3.

  8. Solving quadratic equations with continued fractions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solving_quadratic...

    Denoting the two roots by r 1 and r 2 we distinguish three cases. If the discriminant is zero the fraction converges to the single root of multiplicity two. If the discriminant is not zero, and |r 1 | ≠ |r 2 |, the continued fraction converges to the root of maximum modulus (i.e., to the root with the greater absolute value).

  9. Linear-fractional programming - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear-fractional_programming

    This allows us to require that the denominator of the objective function (+) equals 1. (To understand the transformation, it is instructive to consider the simpler special case with α = β = 0 {\displaystyle \alpha =\beta =0} .)