Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Swap the first element of the array (the largest element in the heap) with the final element of the heap. Decrease the considered range of the heap by one. Call the siftDown() function on the array to move the new first element to its correct place in the heap. Go back to step (2) until the remaining array is a single element.
The elements in the DEPQ will eventually be the middle group (pivot) of elements. Read in the remaining elements. If the next element is ≤ the smallest element in the DEPQ, output this next element as part of the left group. If the next element is ≥ the largest element in the DEPQ, output this next element as part of the right group.
For example, for the array of values [−2, 1, −3, 4, −1, 2, 1, −5, 4], the contiguous subarray with the largest sum is [4, −1, 2, 1], with sum 6. Some properties of this problem are: If the array contains all non-negative numbers, then the problem is trivial; a maximum subarray is the entire array.
The longest increasing subsequence has also been studied in the setting of online algorithms, in which the elements of a sequence of independent random variables with continuous distribution – or alternatively the elements of a random permutation – are presented one at a time to an algorithm that must decide whether to include or exclude ...
That is, if there is a sorting algorithm which can sort in O(S) time per key, where S is some function of n and word size, [22] then one can use the given procedure to create a priority queue where pulling the highest-priority element is O(1) time, and inserting new elements (and deleting elements) is O(S) time.
Whenever the sum of the current element in the first array and the current element in the second array is more than T, the algorithm moves to the next element in the first array. If it is less than T, the algorithm moves to the next element in the second array. If two elements that sum to T are found, it stops. (The sub-problem for two elements ...
It is possible to find the maximum clique, or the clique number, of an arbitrary n-vertex graph in time O (3 n/3) = O (1.4422 n) by using one of the algorithms described above to list all maximal cliques in the graph and returning the largest one. However, for this variant of the clique problem better worst-case time bounds are possible.
In computer science, selection sort is an in-place comparison sorting algorithm.It has a O(n 2) time complexity, which makes it inefficient on large lists, and generally performs worse than the similar insertion sort.