Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
CREW and another liberal-leaning advocacy group, Free Speech For People, started getting serious in mid-2021 about using the 14th Amendment to stop a Trump comeback. Free Speech For People ...
Trump v. Anderson, 601 U.S. 100 (2024), is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously held that states could not determine eligibility for federal office, including the presidency, under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.
A group of First Amendment experts argued that Trump’s remarks at his January 6 rally were “so threatening” that they weren’t protected by his constitutional free-speech rights, and told ...
In a divided 4-3 decision, the Colorado justices, who were all appointed by Democratic governors, ruled that Trump is ineligible to return to the White House under the 14th Amendment, citing his ...
Anti-Trump challengers have succeeded at using the 14th Amendment’s “insurrectionist ban” to remove former President Donald Trump from the ballot in Colorado and Maine, though those ...
Colorado District Court Judge Sarah Wallace issued a stunning 102-page decision Friday, that found Trump “engaged in an insurrection” on January 6, 2021, but concluded that the 14th Amendment ...
At issue is the wording of the Civil War-era clause itself, whether the courts have a right to intervene at this stage if Trump has otherwise met the basic requirements to appear on Colorado's ...
The hearing came on the heels of two losses elsewhere for advocates who are trying to remove Trump from the ballot under Section Three of the 14th Amendment, which bars from office those who swore ...