Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A notable marker of primary research is the inclusion of a "methods" section, where the authors describe how the data was generated. Common examples of secondary research include textbooks, encyclopedias, news articles, review articles, and meta analyses. [2] [3] When conducting secondary research, authors may draw data from published academic ...
Historical method is the collection of techniques and guidelines that historians use to research and write histories of the past. Secondary sources, primary sources and material evidence such as that derived from archaeology may all be drawn on, and the historian's skill lies in identifying these sources, evaluating their relative authority, and combining their testimony appropriately in order ...
Examples in which a source can be both primary and secondary include an obituary [23] or a survey of several volumes of a journal counting the frequency of articles on a certain topic. [23] Whether a source is regarded as primary or secondary in a given context may change, depending upon the present state of knowledge within the field. [24]
Download QR code ; Print/export ... Secondary research. ... Which method is more appropriate often depends on the goal of the research. For example, quantitative ...
The historical method comprises the techniques and guidelines by which historians research primary sources and other evidence, and then write history.The question of the nature, and indeed the possibility, of sound historical method is raised in the philosophy of history, as a question of epistemology.
For example, a peer-reviewed science article including original findings may include a scatter plot of data points and a cross-sectional x-ray (primary material), but it may also include valuable secondary material, such as the research team's synthesis and interpretation of prior published studies reviewed in the discussion of the results or ...
A primary source can have all of these qualities, and a secondary source may have none of them. Deciding whether primary, secondary or tertiary sources are appropriate on any given occasion is a matter of good editorial judgment and common sense, not merely mindless, knee-jerk reactions to classification of a source as "primary" or "secondary".
Archival research lies at the heart of most academic and other forms of original historical research; but it is frequently also undertaken (in conjunction with parallel research methodologies) in other disciplines within the humanities and social sciences, including literary studies, rhetoric, [4] [5] archaeology, sociology, human geography, anthropology, psychology, and organizational studies ...