enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Unlocking Consumer Choice and Wireless Competition Act

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlocking_Consumer_Choice...

    Enacting S. 517 would not affect direct spending or revenues; therefore, pay-as-you-go procedures do not apply. [ 7 ] S. 517 would repeal a rule published in October 2012 by the Librarian of Congress (LOC) that limited the ability of certain owners of wireless telephone handsets to "unlock" their phones, that is, to circumvent software ...

  3. Riley v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riley_v._California

    Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), [1] is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court ruled that the warrantless search and seizure of the digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment.

  4. Reasonable expectation of privacy (United States) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_expectation_of...

    Most Internet users expect some extent of privacy protection from the law while they are online. However, scholars argue that lack of understanding of the Internet as either a public or private space leads to issues in defining expectations of the law. [21] The Fourth Amendment may not protect informational privacy.

  5. Carpenter v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carpenter_v._United_States

    Carpenter v. United States, 585 U.S. 296 (2018), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning the privacy of historical cell site location information (CSLI). The Court held that government entities violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution when accessing historical CSLI records containing the physical locations of cellphones without a search warrant.

  6. Supreme Court of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_California

    The U.S. Supreme Court in turn held that the state supreme court's decision did not amount to a "taking" of the shopping center under federal constitutional law. Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories (1980): [59] The Court imposed market share liability on the makers of fungible hazardous products. Thing v.

  7. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  8. Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Human_Rights...

    The Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law (CHRCL) is a nonprofit organization based in Los Angeles, California. It was founded in 1983 by lawyer Peter Schey with the mission of protecting and furthering the human and civil rights of immigrants, refugees, and other marginalized communities through nationwide class action litigation and activism.

  9. Upgrade to a faster, more secure version of a supported browser. It's free and it only takes a few moments: