Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 535 U.S. 302 (2002), is one of the United States Supreme Court's more recent interpretations of the Takings Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency: Water: supply from Lake Tahoe Basin: Supreme Court of the United States: 2002 Teitiota v Chief Executive Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment: Environment of Kiribati: climate change and immigration: Court of Appeal of New Zealand: 2014 Tennessee Valley ...
Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency: 535 U.S. 302 (2002) substantive due process, takings clause City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books: 535 U.S. 425 (2002) zoning of adult bookstores Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. 535 U.S. 722 (2002) prosecution history estoppel: McKune v. Lile: 536 U.S ...
The lawsuit marks the latest flashpoint in a heated battle over more than 80 ficus trees slated to be ripped out in an effort to revitalize a commercial district. Preservation group sues Whittier ...
Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 535 U.S. 302 (2002), a 2002 United States Supreme Court case involving the regulatory power of the agency. Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 520 U.S. 725 (1997) a 1997 United States Supreme Court case holding a federal court should not consider a claim against an ...
In the lawsuit, he argues that the ... Speaking before the City Council in a 2023 recorded meeting, he called Woodcrest a case study in some of the “unintended consequences” of the city’s ...
One daughter alleged her sister and brother-in-law “targeted” her parents; MLB players wife alledged sister of ‘elder abuse.’
Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency; Tee-Hit-Ton v. United States; Tyler v. Hennepin County; U. United States v. 50 Acres of Land;