Ad
related to: notice of strike in california supreme court case lookup detroit mi state- Criminal Court Records
See If Anyone Has Been To Court
Browse Up To Date Court Records
- County Court Records
Easily Search Court Records Online
Just Enter A Name & Choose A State
- Court Case Records
Get Info On Any Public Court Case
Reveal Incriminating Details Today!
- Court Criminal Check
Court Records, Millions Of Citizens
Available In Our Database. Search
- Criminal Court Records
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The People of the State of California v. Superior Court (Romero), 13 CAL. 4TH 497, 917 P.2D 628 (Cal. 1996), was a landmark case in the state of California that gave California Superior Court judges the ability to dismiss a criminal defendant's "strike prior" pursuant to the California Three-strikes law, thereby avoiding a 25-to-life minimum sentence.
More than 300 published court opinions have interpreted and applied California's anti-SLAPP law. [3] Because the right to file a special motion to strike is substantive immunity to suit , rather than a merely procedural right, federal courts apply the law to state law claims they hear under diversity jurisdiction .
In the 1977 case Abood v.Detroit Board of Education, the Supreme Court upheld the maintaining of a union shop in a public workplace. Public school teachers in Detroit had sought to overturn the requirement that they pay fees equivalent to union dues on the grounds that they opposed public sector collective bargaining and objected to the ideological activities of the union.
The California Supreme Court ruling curtails the ability of public employees in the state to seek help from the courts in labor disputes. Public employees cannot use labor law to sue employers ...
Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63 (2003), [1] decided the same day as Ewing v. California (a case with a similar subject matter), [2] held that there would be no relief by means of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus from a sentence imposed under California's three strikes law as a violation of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishments.
Burnham v. Superior Court of California, 495 U.S. 604 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case addressing whether a state court may, consistent with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, exercise personal jurisdiction over a non-resident of the state who is served with process while temporarily visiting the state.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
On September 11, 2003, the California State Assembly passed SB 796 by a margin of one vote above the minimum required to pass a regular bill. [30] The California State Senate passed the bill by the minimum number of votes necessary. [30] Governor Gray Davis signed the bill on October 12, 2003, and the bill took effect on January 1, 2004. [30]
Ad
related to: notice of strike in california supreme court case lookup detroit mi state