enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ambiguity (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambiguity_(law)

    In the case of a patent ambiguity, parol evidence is admissible to explain only what has been written, not what the writer intended to write. For example, in Saunderson v Piper (1839), [ 7 ] where a bill of exchange was drawn in figures for £245 and in words for two hundred pounds, evidence that "and forty-five" had been omitted by mistake was ...

  3. Kisor v. Wilkie - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kisor_v._Wilkie

    Kisor v. Wilkie, No. 18-15, 588 U.S. ___ (2019), was a US Supreme Court case related to the interpretation by an executive agency of its own ambiguous regulations. The case involved a veteran who had been denied some benefits from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs due to the agency's interpretation of its regulations.

  4. Rule of lenity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_lenity

    The rule of lenity is one such canon. Implicit in its provisions is the additional burden placed on the prosecution in a criminal case and the protection of individual rights against the powers of the state. It also furthers the fundamental principle of requiring notice in criminal law. Individuals should not be punished for their acts when the ...

  5. Rule in Shelley's Case - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_in_Shelley's_Case

    The Rule in Shelley's Case is a rule of law that may apply to certain future interests in real property and trusts created in common law jurisdictions. [1]: 181 It was applied as early as 1366 in The Provost of Beverly's Case [1]: 182 [2] but in its present form is derived from Shelley's Case (1581), [3] in which counsel stated the rule as follows:

  6. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    images.huffingtonpost.com/2013-03-09-amicus.pdf

    Case 1:10-cv-01067-RBW-DAR Document 212 Filed 12/14/12 Page 8 of 38 2 led the Project’s extensive and transparent approval process fully complied with all applicable

  7. Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepper_(Inspector_of_Taxes...

    Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart [1992] UKHL 3, is a landmark decision of the House of Lords on the use of legislative history in statutory interpretation.The court established the principle that when primary legislation is ambiguous then, in certain circumstances, the court may refer to statements made in the House of Commons or House of Lords in an attempt to interpret the meaning of the ...

  8. Ambiguous case - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=Ambiguous_case&redirect=no

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Redirect page

  9. US asks court to reject TikTok's bid to stave off law that ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-asks-court-reject-delay...

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Justice Department late on Wednesday asked a U.S. appeals court to reject an emergency bid by TikTok to temporarily block a law that would require its Chinese parent ...