Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
For k ≥ 4, Ek-Set Splitting is approximation resistant. That is, unless P=NP, there is no polynomial-time (factor) approximation algorithm which does essentially better than a random partition. [5] [6] The weighted set splitting is a variant in which the subsets in F have weights and the objective is to maximize the total weight of the split ...
When a set S i that has already been chosen is split by a refinement, only one of the two resulting sets (the smaller of the two) needs to be chosen again; in this way, each state participates in the sets X for O(s log n) refinement steps and the overall algorithm takes time O(ns log n), where n is the number of initial states and s is the size ...
When the variable appears in two sets of constraints, it is possible to substitute the new variables in the first constraints and in the second, and then join the two variables with a new "linking" constraint, [2] which requires that
A related problem, somewhat similar to the Birthday paradox, is that of determining the size of the input set so that we have a probability of one half that there is a solution, under the assumption that each element in the set is randomly selected with uniform distribution between 1 and some given value. The solution to this problem can be ...
A cut C = (S, T) is a partition of V of a graph G = (V, E) into two subsets S and T. The cut-set of a cut C = (S, T) is the set {(u, v) ∈ E | u ∈ S, v ∈ T} of edges that have one endpoint in S and the other endpoint in T. If s and t are specified vertices of the graph G, then an s – t cut is a cut in which s belongs to the set S and t ...
Therefore, the remaining 3-sets can be partitioned into two groups: n 3-sets containing the items u ij, and n 3-sets containing the items u ij '. In each matching pair of 3-sets, the sum of the two pairing items u ij +u ij ' is 44T+4, so the sum of the four regular items is 84T+4. Therefore, from the four regular items, we construct a 4-set in ...
Since every set is contained in its closure, two separated sets automatically must be disjoint. The closures themselves do not have to be disjoint from each other; for example, the intervals [ 0 , 1 ) {\displaystyle [0,1)} and ( 1 , 2 ] {\displaystyle (1,2]} are separated in the real line R , {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ,} even though the point ...
This article lists mathematical properties and laws of sets, involving the set-theoretic operations of union, intersection, and complementation and the relations of set equality and set inclusion. It also provides systematic procedures for evaluating expressions, and performing calculations, involving these operations and relations.