enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Accuracy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Accuracy

    In addition to accuracy of individual statements, it is an objective that articles provide overall accurate coverage of the topic, albeit the latter is less clear-cut. This includes balanced coverage, with inclusion weighted by degree of significance, informativeness on the topic, and directness of relevance to the topic. The article should not ...

  3. Wikipedia and fact-checking - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_and_fact-checking

    Wikipedia articles can have poor quality in many ways including self-contradictions. [2] Those poor articles require improvement. Large platforms including YouTube [3] and Facebook [4] use Wikipedia's content to confirm the accuracy of the information in their own media collections.

  4. Fact-checking - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact-checking

    A study by Yale University cognitive scientists Gordon Pennycook and David G. Rand found that Facebook tags of fake articles "did significantly reduce their perceived accuracy relative to a control without tags, but only modestly". [18] A Dartmouth study led by Brendan Nyhan found that Facebook tags had a greater impact than the Yale study found.

  5. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians, who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves.

  6. Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia

    The study found that while the information in these articles tended to be accurate, the articles examined contained many errors of omission. [ 67 ] A 2012 study co-authored by Shane Greenstein examined a decade of Wikipedia articles on United States politics and found that the more contributors there were to a given article, the more neutral it ...

  7. Wikipedia:Content assessment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_assessment

    The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure.

  8. Wikipedia:Verifiability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability

    Base articles on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Source material must be published, on Wikipedia meaning made available to the public in some form. [f] Unpublished material is not considered reliable. Use sources that directly support the material presented in an article and are ...

  9. Wikipedia:Neutral point of view - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of...

    In principle, all articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. When writing about a topic, basing content on the best respected and most authoritative reliable sources helps to prevent bias, undue weight, and other NPOV disagreements.