enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Robinson v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robinson_v._California

    Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962), is the first landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution was interpreted to prohibit criminalization of particular acts or conduct, as contrasted with prohibiting the use of a particular form of punishment for a crime.

  3. Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eighth_Amendment_to_the...

    In Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962), the Court decided a California law authorizing a 90-day jail sentence for "be[ing] addicted to the use of narcotics" violated the Eighth Amendment, as narcotics addiction "is apparently an illness", and California was attempting to punish people based on the state of this illness, rather than for ...

  4. How a Supreme Court ruling led to Gavin Newsom’s order on ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-ruling-led-gavin...

    Boise, the status of homelessness. The 1962 case, Robinson v. California, involved the status of being addicted to drugs. Following the decision in Martin v. Boise, lawyers representing homeless ...

  5. Supreme Court says cities can ban homeless encampments. How ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-says-cities-more...

    The 1962 case, Robinson v. California, specifically regarded the status of being addicted to drugs. Following the Ninth Circuit decision, lawyers representing unhoused residents sued Grants Pass ...

  6. City of Grants Pass v. Johnson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Grants_Pass_v._Johnson

    In the 1962 case Robinson v. California, the Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment prohibits criminalization of a status, as opposed to criminalizing criminal acts, in striking down a California law that criminalized being addicted to narcotics. [2] In the 1968 case Powell v.

  7. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    California did not violate the Due Process Clause when entering a binding judgment on a Texas corporation with "substantial connection[s]" to California Lambert v. California: 355 U.S. 225 (1957) mens rea and ignorance of the law: One, Inc. v. Olesen: 355 U.S. 371 (1958) pro-homosexual writings and the Comstock laws: Perez v. Brownell: 356 U.S ...

  8. United States v. Robinson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Robinson

    United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 (1973), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that "in the case of a lawful custodial arrest a full search of the person is not only an exception to the warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment, but is also a reasonable search under that Amendment."

  9. Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases/Reports/B

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_U.S...

    Stansbury v. California: 7 Cox v. United States (1947) 8 Palmer v. Thompson: 9 National Federation of Independent Business v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: 10 Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez: 11 Lange v. California: 12 Menominee Tribe v. United States: 13 Shaffer v. Heitner: 14 United States v. Robinson: 15 Goldman v. Weinberger ...