Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The two main equitable remedies are injunctions and specific performance, and in casual legal parlance references to equitable remedies are often expressed as referring to those two remedies alone. Injunctions may be mandatory (requiring a person to do something) or prohibitory (stopping them doing something).
Injunction, a prohibitory writ restraing a person from doing a thing which appears to be against equity and good conscience. 3 Bac Abr 172. [ 14 ] Writ of inquiry , a judicial writ to the sheriff upon a judgment by default, commanding him to summon a jury to inquire what damages plaintiff has sustained.
A complete list of Pennsylvania schools named in the injunction can be found in the table below. Chris Ullery is the Philadelphia Hub Data Reporter for the USA Today Network. Reach him at cullery ...
A "writ of prohibition", in the United States, is a court order rendered by a higher court to a judge presiding over a suit in an inferior court. The writ of prohibition mandates the inferior court to cease any action over the case because it may not fall within that inferior court's jurisdiction.
In England and Wales, injunctions whose existence and details may not be legally reported, in addition to facts or allegations which may not be disclosed, have been issued; they have been informally dubbed "super-injunctions". [26] [27] An example was the super-injunction raised in September 2009 by Carter-Ruck solicitors on behalf of oil ...
Injunctions in English law are a legal remedy of three types. Prohibitory injunctions prevent an individual or group from beginning or continuing actions which threaten or breach the legal rights of another. Mandatory injunctions are rarer and compel a person to carry out a certain act such as make restitution to an injured party.
implied warranties, violation of the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, violation of Alabama’s unfair and deceptive trade practices act, conspiracy, medical expenses incurred by parent, loss of consortium, and punitive damages. Id. Case ID: 120401997 Control No.: 15031068
Held that an organization may sue in its own right if it has been directly injured, for example through a "drain on the organization's resources", and that so-called "testers", individuals who sought to determine if a company was in violation of the law, may have standing in their own right. [8] 9–0 [9] City of Los Angeles v. Lyons: 1983