Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In a well-dimensioned hash table, the average time complexity for each lookup is independent of the number of elements stored in the table. Many hash table designs also allow arbitrary insertions and deletions of key–value pairs, at amortized constant average cost per operation. [3] [4] [5] Hashing is an example of a space-time tradeoff.
Perfect hash functions may be used to implement a lookup table with constant worst-case access time. A perfect hash function can, as any hash function, be used to implement hash tables, with the advantage that no collision resolution has to be implemented. In addition, if the keys are not in the data and if it is known that queried keys will be ...
hash HAS-160: 160 bits hash HAVAL: 128 to 256 bits hash JH: 224 to 512 bits hash LSH [19] 256 to 512 bits wide-pipe Merkle–Damgård construction: MD2: 128 bits hash MD4: 128 bits hash MD5: 128 bits Merkle–Damgård construction: MD6: up to 512 bits Merkle tree NLFSR (it is also a keyed hash function) RadioGatún: arbitrary ideal mangling ...
For example, if the input is 123 456 789 and the hash table size 10 000, then squaring the key produces 15 241 578 750 190 521, so the hash code is taken as the middle 4 digits of the 17-digit number (ignoring the high digit) 8750. The mid-squares method produces a reasonable hash code if there is not a lot of leading or trailing zeros in the key.
The FNV-0 hash differs from the FNV-1 hash only by the initialisation value of the hash variable: [9] [13] algorithm fnv-0 is hash := 0 for each byte_of_data to be hashed do hash := hash × FNV_prime hash := hash XOR byte_of_data return hash. The above pseudocode has the same assumptions that were noted for the FNV-1 pseudocode.
2-left hashing—using two hash tables of equal size n/2, and asymmetrically resolving ties by putting the key in the left hash table—has fewer collisions and therefore better performance than 2-choice hashing with one large hash table of size n. [4] [full citation needed]
A concurrent hash table or concurrent hash map is an implementation of hash tables allowing concurrent access by multiple threads using a hash function. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] Concurrent hash tables represent a key concurrent data structure for use in concurrent computing which allow multiple threads to more efficiently cooperate for a computation among ...
For any fixed set of keys, using a universal family guarantees the following properties.. For any fixed in , the expected number of keys in the bin () is /.When implementing hash tables by chaining, this number is proportional to the expected running time of an operation involving the key (for example a query, insertion or deletion).