Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In contract law, a severable contract (or "divisible contract") is a contract that is composed of several separate contracts concluded between the same parties, such that failing one part of such a 'severable' contract does not breach the whole contract. Therefore, the other party must still honor the other subparts and cannot cancel the whole ...
Tort insurance vs no-fault insurance. States fall into two main categories when it comes to car insurance: at-fault/tort states or no-fault states. The majority of the states in the country apply ...
Subject to the "fortuity principle", the event must be uncertain. The uncertainty can be either as to when the event will happen (e.g. in a life insurance policy, the time of the insured's death is uncertain) or as to if it will happen at all (e.g. in a fire insurance policy, whether or not a fire will occur at all). [4]
Driver profile. Average annual full coverage premium. Clean record. $2,458. Coverage lapse. $2,705. 18-year-old (standalone policy) $6,687. DUI conviction. $4,713
Legally required minimums only cover damage you cause. Even with comprehensive and collision, you're financially vulnerable. Learn top situations your standard car insurance won’t cover — and ...
The test of whether a clause is severable is an objective test—whether a reasonable person would see the contract standing even without the clauses. Typically, non-severable contracts only require the substantial performance of a promise rather than the whole or complete performance of a promise to warrant payment.
If Ann sued Charlotte's bar alone, Charlotte's bar would be liable for the full $10 million despite only being 10% at fault for the injury. If Charlotte's bar had an insurance policy with a liability limit of less than $10 million, the bar would remain liable for any amount over and above the policy limit.
[22] [23] With a concurrent increase in the cost of liability insurance per airplane rising from $50 in 1962 to $100,000 in 1988, and many underwriters had begun to refuse all new policies. [24] [25] [26] [23]