Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Violent crime rate per 100k population by state (2023) [1] This is a list of U.S. states and territories by violent crime rate. It is typically expressed in units of incidents per 100,000 individuals per year; thus, a violent crime rate of 300 (per 100,000 inhabitants) in a population of 100,000 would mean 300 incidents of violent crime per year in that entire population, or 0.3% out of the total.
In 2009 and 2010, Tennessee had the highest rate of violent gun crime of any US state, although less than that of Washington D.C. Tennessee ranked highest in the nation for the rate of aggravated assaults with a firearm, and ranked fifth-worst in robberies. [1] In 2014, 240,295 crimes were reported, including 371 murders. [2]
The following table of United States cities by crime rate is based on Federal Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) statistics from 2019 for the 100 most populous cities in America that have reported data to the FBI UCR system. [1] The population numbers are based on U.S. Census estimates for the year end.
For January through March 2024, violent crime was down 15.2% compared to the same period last year. Murder decreased 26.4% year over year, and rape declined about the same, with a drop of 25.7%.
More than 45 gun stores across Tennessee have been identified as ones that sell the most firearms used in crimes. Here's why they are on that list.
English: Map of violent crime per 100,000 people in the USA by state in 2016. "Violent crime" includes Homicide, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. ...
LANCASTER COUNTY, Pa. (WHTM)– Police in Lancaster County have apprehended a “violent fugitive” who was on the run for allegedly raping and assaulting a woman last week. According to the ...
Crime rates per capita might also be biased by population size depending on the crime type. [6] This misrepresentation occurs because rates per capita assume that crime increases at the same pace as the number of people in an area. [7] When this linear assumption does not hold, rates per capita still have population effects.