Ads
related to: attorneys that sue unionscasepost.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
sidekickbird.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No. 174, 598 U.S. 771 (2023) was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States related to federal labor law, concerning the power of employers to sue labor unions regarding destruction of employer property following a strike.
Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, No. 16-1466, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), abbreviated Janus v.AFSCME, is a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on US labor law, concerning the power of labor unions to collect fees from non-union members.
Dominated by Republican appointees, the Supreme Court suppressed labor rights, removing rights of professors, religious school teachers, or illegal immigrants to organize in a union, [52] allowing employees to be searched at work, [53] and eliminating employee rights to sue for medical malpractice in their own health care. [54]
After all, the Court had already held that unions could not bargain away their members’ right to sue in court under Title VII for employment discrimination (1974’s Alexander v.
Florida’s attorney general has filed a lawsuit against the Biden administration over its pushback against a state law that centers around regulating unions. The lawsuit, filed Wednesday by ...
Right-to-work proponents, including the Center for Union Facts, contend that political contributions made by unions are not representative of the union workers. [20] The agency shop portion of this had previously been contested with support of National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation in Communications Workers of America v.
Ads
related to: attorneys that sue unionscasepost.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
sidekickbird.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month