Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Brewer v. Williams , 430 U.S. 387 (1977), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court that clarifies what constitutes "waiver" of the right to counsel for the purposes of the Sixth Amendment. Under Miranda v.
As stated in Brewer v.Williams, 430 U.S. 387 (1977), the right to counsel "means at least that a person is entitled to the help of a lawyer at or after the time that judicial proceedings have been initiated against him, 'whether by way of formal charge, preliminary hearing, indictment, information, or arraignment. ' " [2] Brewer goes on to conclude that once adversarial proceedings have begun ...
Williams v. Florida: 399 U.S. 78 (1970) Twelve-man jury: North Carolina v. Alford: 400 U.S. 25 (1970) Guilty plea in criminal case Oregon v. Mitchell: 400 U.S. 112 (1970) Age and voting rights in state elections Massachusetts v. Laird: 400 U.S. 886 (1970) Court declined to hear a case related to the constitutionality of the Vietnam War: Baird v ...
In 2004, the Supreme Court of the United States formulated a new test in Crawford v. Washington to determine whether the Confrontation Clause applies in a criminal case. The Confrontation Clause has its roots in both English common law , protecting the right of cross-examination , and Roman law , which guaranteed persons accused of a crime the ...
One of Robbie Williams‘ most controversial moments is set to be immortalised in his new biopic.. The singer is played by a rather unlikely figure in the forthcoming film Better Man, which tells ...
The Monthly Film Bulletin wrote: "Dudley Moore's exceptional gifts as a comedian and a musician are poorly served by the frantic direction of Joseph McGrath's film; and the leaden script—assembled rather than written by Moore, the director and John Wells—is little more than a collection of mildly diverting television sketches bound together ...
When the film goes most over the top, Williams’ commentary keeps it grounded. “Better Man” isn’t perfect – as a straightforward effort, it doesn't hold a candle to, say, "A Complete ...
Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291 (1980), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court that clarifies what constitutes "interrogation" for the purposes of Miranda warnings. Under Miranda v. Arizona, police are forbidden from interrogating a suspect once he has asserted his right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment.