enow.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: bank charges court case summary san bernardino superior court open access

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. California superior courts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Superior_Courts

    Another quirk is that because the superior courts are now fully unified with all courts of inferior jurisdiction, the superior courts must hear relatively minor cases that previously would have been heard in such inferior courts, such as infractions, misdemeanors, "limited civil" actions (actions where the amount in controversy is below $35,000), and "small claims" actions.

  3. San Bernardino County Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Bernardino_County...

    The 1874 courthouse served until 1898, when the second courthouse was completed. This second courthouse had a protracted development: an initial proposition to issue bonds for US$125,000 (equivalent to $4,240,000 in 2023) to build a new County Jail and Court House was defeated by voters in 1887, so the board of supervisors reissued the proposition for US$75,000 in bonds to build a new Hall of ...

  4. California Court Case Management System - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Court_Case...

    Five Superior Courts—in Orange, Sacramento, San Diego, San Joaquin, and Ventura Counties—use CCMS version 3 to process civil cases. This represents approximately 25 percent of the civil case volume in California. [3] Fresno is the only Superior Court still using version 2 of CCMS.

  5. Discover Bank v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Discover_Bank_v._Superior_Court

    Discover Bank v. Superior Court (30 Cal.Rptr.3d 76) is a 2005 case where the California Supreme Court ruled that an arbitration clause was unenforceable because a class-action waiver contained within it would exculpate Discover Bank from liability for wrongdoing involving small sums of damages.

  6. Lopez v. Seccombe - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lopez_v._Seccombe

    Lopez v. Seccombe. 71 F. Supp. 769. 1, US District Court for the Southern District of California, 1944, was a 1944 court case within the city and county of San Bernardino about whether Mexican Americans were able to use the city's public pool at any time despite the cities restricted limits.

  7. Consulting firm McKinsey to pay $650 million to resolve US ...

    www.aol.com/news/consulting-firm-mckinsey-pay...

    BOSTON (Reuters) -McKinsey & Co has agreed to pay $650 million to resolve a U.S. Department of Justice investigation into the consulting firm's work advising opioid manufacturer OxyContin maker ...

  8. Deemed 'too broken to fix,' San Bernardino County child ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/deemed-too-broken-fix-san...

    A federal class-action lawsuit on behalf of more than 5,800 youths alleges San Bernardino County Children and Family Services, an agency that was deemed "too broken to fix" by a civil grand jury ...

  9. Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamex_Operations_West...

    Dynamex Operations W. v. Superior Court and Charles Lee, Real Party in Interest, 4 Cal.5th 903 (Cal. 2018) was a landmark case handed down by the California Supreme Court on April 30, 2018. A class of drivers for a same-day delivery company, Dynamex, claimed that they were misclassified as independent contractors and thus unlawfully deprived of ...

  1. Ads

    related to: bank charges court case summary san bernardino superior court open access