Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Shop right, in United States patent law, is an implied license under which a firm may use a patented invention, invented by an employee who was working within the scope of their employment, using the firms' equipment, or inventing at the firms' expense.
the patented invention is not available to the public at a reasonably affordable price, or, the patented invention is not worked [25] in the territory of India. In March 2012, India granted its first compulsory license ever to Indian generic drug manufacturer Natco Pharma for Sorafenib tosylate, a cancer drug patented by Bayer. [26]
Assign rights to a subject invention only to an organization having as a primary function the management of inventions, unless approved by the Federal agency; Share royalties with the inventor; Use the balance of royalties after expenses for scientific research or education; Make efforts to attract, and give preference to, small business licensees.
A 4% royalty on sales value for a 5-year period of the license, together with a lump-sum payment of $32000 (risk-free income) on execution of the license is then the 'asking price' in the example. The TTF of this projection is 2.6, implying that for every dollar of royalty paid, the OP to the licensee enterprise is multiplied by this factor.
The term "cross licensing" implies that neither party pays monetary royalties to the other party, although this may be the case. For example, Microsoft and JVC entered into a cross license agreement in January 2008. [3] Each party, therefore, is able to practice the inventions covered by the patents included in the agreement. [4]
Patentleft is the practice of licensing patents (especially biological patents) for royalty-free use, on the condition that adopters license related improvements they develop under the same terms. Copyleft-style licensors seek "continuous growth of a universally accessible technology commons" from which they, and others, will benefit.
ASI Entertainment Receives First Royalties SEATLLE--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- ASI Entertainment, Inc. (OTCQB:ASIQ) announced today that it has received royalties from its intellectual property licensed to ...
Reasonableness is determined by the standard practices of the particular industry most relevant to the invention, as well as any other relevant or similar royalty history of the patentee. Lost profits are determined by a "but for" analysis (e.g. "My client would have made X dollars in profit but for the infringement of the client's patent.")