enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Opinion - The looming post-Chevron fight over the ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/opinion-looming-post-chevron-fight...

    Courts should be vigilant about ensuring that the government does not just smuggle Chevron deference back into administrative law for a substantial subset of regulatory cases. If early post-Loper ...

  3. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v...

    Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that set forth the legal test used when U.S. federal courts must defer to a government agency's interpretation of a law or statute. [1] The decision articulated a doctrine known as "Chevron deference". [2]

  4. What it means for the Supreme Court to throw out Chevron ...

    www.aol.com/news/means-supreme-court-throw...

    The Biden administration has defended the law, warning that overturning so-called Chevron deference would be destabilizing and could bring a “convulsive shock” to the nation's legal system.

  5. Chevron takeaways: Supreme Court ruling removes frequently ...

    www.aol.com/news/chevron-takeaways-supreme-court...

    “The dismantling of the Chevron doctrine grants every Trump-appointed judge the authority to overrule agency experts’ interpretation of the law and substitute their ideological viewpoint for ...

  6. Auer v. Robbins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auer_v._Robbins

    In Chevron, there was a two-step standard of review. The Chevron standard dealt with "a formal rationale for judicial deference to an agency's interpretation of a statute." Auer did not adopt the two-step process for review in Chevron but a single level standard of deference "to an agency's permissible interpretation of its regulation."

  7. Column: With its 'Chevron' ruling, the Supreme Court claims ...

    www.aol.com/news/column-chevron-ruling-supreme...

    The case concerned a 40-year-old precedent known as “Chevron deference.” That doctrine held that when a federal law is ambiguous, the courts must defer to the interpretations offered by the ...

  8. United States v. Haggar Apparel Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Haggar...

    The Court also ruled that the CIT must, when appropriate, give regulations Chevron deference. The Court noted that as early as 1809, Chief Justice Marshall had written in United States v. Vowell that for customs cases "if the question had been doubtful, the court would have respected the uniform construction which it is understood has been ...

  9. How the Supreme Court’s blockbuster ‘Chevron’ ruling puts ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-blockbuster-chevron...

    The so-called Chevron doctrine — named after the case, Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council — told courts to defer to an agency’s interpretation of a statute in circumstances in ...