Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The longest alternating subsequence problem has also been studied in the setting of online algorithms, in which the elements of are presented in an online fashion, and a decision maker needs to decide whether to include or exclude each element at the time it is first presented, without any knowledge of the elements that will be presented in the future, and without the possibility of recalling ...
Comparison of two revisions of an example file, based on their longest common subsequence (black) A longest common subsequence (LCS) is the longest subsequence common to all sequences in a set of sequences (often just two sequences).
If the tree is traversed from the bottom up with a bit vector telling which strings are seen below each node, the k-common substring problem can be solved in () time. If the suffix tree is prepared for constant time lowest common ancestor retrieval, it can be solved in () time. [2]
The above algorithm has worst-case time and space complexities of O(mn) (see big O notation), where m is the number of elements in sequence A and n is the number of elements in sequence B. The Hunt–Szymanski algorithm modifies this algorithm to have a worst-case time complexity of O ( mn log m ) and space complexity of O ( mn ) , though it ...
The problem of computing a longest common subsequence has been well studied in computer science. It can be solved in polynomial time by dynamic programming ; [ 5 ] this basic algorithm has additional speedups for small alphabets (the Method of Four Russians ), [ 6 ] for strings with few differences, [ 7 ] for strings with few matching pairs of ...
The longest increasing subsequences are studied in the context of various disciplines related to mathematics, including algorithmics, random matrix theory, representation theory, and physics. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] The longest increasing subsequence problem is solvable in time O ( n log n ) , {\displaystyle O(n\log n),} where n {\displaystyle n ...
For example, for the array of values [−2, 1, −3, 4, −1, 2, 1, −5, 4], the contiguous subarray with the largest sum is [4, −1, 2, 1], with sum 6. Some properties of this problem are: If the array contains all non-negative numbers, then the problem is trivial; a maximum subarray is the entire array.
The closely related problem of finding a minimum-length string which is a superstring of a finite set of strings S = { s 1,s 2,...,s n} is also NP-hard. [2] Several constant factor approximations have been proposed throughout the years, and the current best known algorithm has an approximation factor of 2.475. [3]