enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. English rule (attorney's fees) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_rule_(attorney's_fees)

    The English rule provides that the party that loses in court pays the other party's legal costs. The English rule contrasts with the American rule , under which each party is generally responsible for paying its own attorney fees (unless a statute or contract provides otherwise).

  3. California Consumers Legal Remedies Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Consumers_Legal...

    The California Consumers Legal Remedies Act ("CLRA") is the name for California Civil Code §§ 1750 et seq. [1] The CLRA declares unlawful several "methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices undertaken by any person in a transaction intended to result or which results in the sale or lease of goods or services to any consumer". [2]

  4. American rule (attorney's fees) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_rule_(attorney's...

    The American rule (capitalized as American Rule in some U.S. states) is the default legal rule in the United States controlling assessment of attorneys' fees arising out of litigation. It provides that each party is responsible for paying its own attorney's fees, [1] [2] unless specific authority granted by statute or contract allows the ...

  5. Costs in English law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Costs_in_English_law

    In English civil litigation, costs are the lawyers' fees and disbursements of the parties.. In the absence of any order or directive regarding costs, each party is liable to pay their own solicitors' costs and disbursements such as a barrister's fees; in case of dispute, the court has jurisdiction to assess and determine the proper amount.

  6. Champerty and maintenance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Champerty_and_maintenance

    There are circumstances in which a non-party who funds litigation can be liable for costs, if the action fails. [ 15 ] [ 16 ] [ 17 ] For instance, in Re Oasis Merchandising Services Ltd [ 18 ] the Court of Appeal reincarnated the tort against the assignment of a wrongful trading claim by a liquidator to a specialist litigation company to ...

  7. California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Retail_Liquor...

    The national policy in favor of competition cannot be thwarted by casting such a gauzy cloak of state involvement over what is essentially a private price-fixing arrangement. Pp. 102–106. 2. The Twenty-first Amendment does not bar application of the Sherman Act to California's wine-pricing system. Pp. 106–114.

  8. Want to own a bookstore bar? $250K buys it all at ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/want-own-bookstore-bar-250k...

    The sale also comes with the store's liquor license, and deals with distributors and publishers. Want to own a bookstore bar? $250K buys it all at Riffraff in Providence Skip to main content

  9. California Unfair Competition Law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Unfair...

    California's UCL is broadly written. [19] Section 17200 includes five definitions of unfair competition: (1) an unlawful business act or practice; (2) an unfair business act or practice; (3) a fraudulent business act or practice; (4) unfair, deceptive, untrue, or misleading advertising; or (5) any act prohibited by Sections 17500-17577.5. [20]

  1. Related searches english rule litigation act california book store for sale private party

    american rule litigationcalifornia consumer legal remedies act prohibited