enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Mfg.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grable_&_Sons_Metal...

    Souter, joined by unanimous. Concurrence. Thomas. Laws applied. 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Mfg., 545 U.S. 308 (2005), was a United States Supreme Court decision [1] involving the jurisdiction of the federal district courts under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question jurisdiction). [2]

  3. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loretto_v._Teleprompter...

    Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419 (1982), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that when the character of the governmental action is a permanent physical occupation of property, the government actions effects regulatory taking to the extent of the occupation, without regard to whether the action achieves an important public benefit or has ...

  4. U.S. Const. amend. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978), was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision on compensation for regulatory takings. [1] Penn Central sued New York City after the New York City Landmark Preservation Commission denied its bid to build a large office building on top of Grand Central ...

  5. New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Supreme_Court...

    The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York is the intermediate appellate court in New York State. [2] The state is geographically divided into four judicial departments of the Appellate Division. [3] The full title of each is, using the "Fourth Department" as an example, the "Supreme Court of the State of New York ...

  6. Meinhard v. Salmon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meinhard_v._Salmon

    Meinhard v. Salmon, 164 N.E. 545 (N.Y. 1928), is a widely cited case in which the New York Court of Appeals held that partners in a business owe fiduciary duties to one another where a business opportunity arises during the course of the partnership. The court holds that the fiduciary duty of communication was breached where a partner in a ...

  7. New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_State_Supreme...

    The First Department of the Appellate Division holds jurisdiction over the Counties of New York and the Bronx.Appeals are taken to the Appellate Division, as a matter of right, in civil and criminal cases, from the Supreme Court, Surrogate's Court, Family Court, and Court of Claims.

  8. New York AG asks appeals court to uphold Trump's $454M fraud ...

    www.aol.com/york-ag-asks-appeals-court-031800279...

    New York Attorney General Letitia James asked a state appeals court Wednesday to uphold a lower court's determination that former President Donald Trump, his adult sons and his company are liable ...

  9. New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_State_Rifle...

    II, XIV, Sullivan Act. New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), abbreviated NYSRPA v. Bruen and also known as NYSRPA II or Bruen to distinguish it from the 2020 case, is a landmark decision [1][2][3] of the United States Supreme Court related to the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.