enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Adversarial system - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adversarial_system

    Judges in an adversarial system are impartial in ensuring the fair play of due process, or fundamental justice.Such judges decide, often when called upon by counsel rather than of their own motion, what evidence is to be admitted when there is a dispute; though in some common law jurisdictions judges play more of a role in deciding what evidence to admit into the record or reject.

  3. Courtroom workgroup - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courtroom_Workgroup

    In the United States criminal justice system, a Courtroom workgroup is an informal arrangement between a criminal prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, and the judicial officer. This foundational concept in the academic discipline of criminal justice recharacterizes the seemingly adversarial courtroom participants as collaborators in "doing ...

  4. Amid double jeopardy question in gang killing mistrial ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/amid-double-jeopardy-gang-killing...

    Allowing, for appellate review, the state and defense an opportunity to object on the record is a central element in an adversarial system of justice, Alkon said. “It’s a problem if a court ...

  5. Plea bargaining in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plea_bargaining_in_the...

    Several features of the American justice system tend to promote plea bargaining. The adversarial nature of the system puts judges in a passive role, in which they are completely dependent upon the parties to develop the factual record and cannot independently discover information with which to assess the strength of the case against the defendant.

  6. Conflict model (criminal justice) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_Model_(criminal...

    System conflict theory argues that worries over fame, promotions, wages, and success cause the criminal justice system to conflict with itself.This perspective argues that there is no true system and points to the role of adversarial processes, in particular, which are seen to be basic to the "system", and the fact that many criminal justice organizations habitually share as little information ...

  7. Massiah v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massiah_v._United_States

    Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201 (1964), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the government from eliciting statements from the defendant about themselves after the point that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches.

  8. Special counsel says Biden’s criticism of prosecution of son ...

    www.aol.com/special-counsel-says-biden-criticism...

    President Biden unfairly attacked the integrity of the justice system by criticizing the long-running federal investigations into his son Hunter Biden, to whom he granted a federal pardon ...

  9. But despite no penalty at all, Donald Trump will rightly appeal this bogus conviction. At his sentencing, the president-elect blasted the left and their attempts to weaponize our system of justice