enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Arizona v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_v._California

    460 U.S. 605 (1983): The court issued a decree regarding unadjudicated rights of Indian tribes to Colorado River water. 466 U.S. 144 (1984): The court adjusted its previous decree. 531 U.S. 1 (2000): The court adjusted the specified amounts of water for several parties to the case. 547 U.S. 150 (2006): The court approved a consolidated decree.

  3. Supreme Court to hear challenge to California's pace-setting ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-hear-challenge...

    California wants to move away from gas-powered cars. But 'the Golden State is not the golden child,' 17 states complained to the Supreme Court.

  4. U.S. Supreme Court will decide if oil industry may sue to ...

    www.aol.com/news/u-supreme-court-decide-oil...

    The Supreme Court opened the door Friday for a potential challenge to California's long-standing authority to set stricter emissions limits for new vehicles, including its "zero emissions" goal ...

  5. Supreme Court of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_California

    A small group of lawyers later recovered and compiled all the unreported opinions filed by the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Commission before that point, which were published in a separate seven-volume reporter called California Unreported Cases starting in 1913. [2] [31] Despite its name, those cases are citable as precedent. [32]

  6. Sheetz v. County of El Dorado - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheetz_v._County_of_El_Dorado

    Sheetz v. County of El Dorado (Docket No. 22-1074) is a United States Supreme Court case regarding permit exactions under the Takings Clause.The Supreme Court held, in a unanimous opinion by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, that fees for land-use permits must be closely related and roughly proportional to the effects of the land use – the test established by Nollan v.

  7. Supreme Court to consider reviving industry’s bid to axe ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-consider-reviving...

    The Supreme Court indicated Friday that it will take up a case that could revive industry efforts to axe California’s stricter-than-federal vehicle emissions standards. The high court granted a ...

  8. Lange v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lange_v._California

    Lange v. California, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the exigent circumstances requirement related to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court ruled unanimously that the warrantless entry into a home by police in pursuit of a misdemeanant is not unequivocally justified.

  9. Smith v. Maryland - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._Maryland

    Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979), was a Supreme Court case holding that the installation and use of a pen register by the police to obtain information on a suspect's telephone calls was not a "search" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and hence no search warrant was required.