enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viacom_International_Inc...

    Viacom International, Inc. v. YouTube, Inc., 676 F.3d 19 (2nd Cir., 2012), was a United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decision regarding liability for copyright infringement committed by the users of an online video hosting platform.

  3. List of United States Supreme Court patent case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Patent applicants who are unhappy with the final decision of the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board have two options to appeal: they can appeal to the Federal Circuit (which conducts a limited review of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision) or sue the USPTO Director in the Eastern District of Virginia (which can consider new evidence ...

  4. List of United States patent law cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    This is a list of notable patent law cases in the United States in chronological order. The cases have been decided notably by the United States Supreme Court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) or the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI). While the Federal Circuit (CAFC) sits below the Supreme Court ...

  5. Peter v. NantKwest, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_v._NantKwest,_Inc.

    Peter v. NantKwest Inc., 589 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case from the October 2019 term. In a unanimous opinion, the Supreme Court ruled that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) was not entitled to be reimbursed for attorney's fees from patent applicants, who file appeals against USPTO decisions.

  6. Microsoft hit with $242 million US verdict in Cortana patent ...

    www.aol.com/news/microsoft-hit-242-million-us...

    Microsoft must pay patent owner IPA Technologies $242 million, a federal jury in Delaware said on Friday after determining that Microsoft's Cortana virtual-assistant software infringed an IPA patent.

  7. Amgen Inc v. Sanofi - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amgen_Inc_v._Sanofi

    Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, 598 U.S. 594 (2023), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Amgen's two patent applications on cholesterol-lowering drugs failed to satisfy the enablement clause of §112 of the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 112(a).

  8. United States Patents Quarterly - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Patents...

    The United States Patents Quarterly (U.S.P.Q.) is a United States legal reporter published by the Bloomberg Industry Group [1] in Washington, D.C. The U.S.P.Q. covers intellectual property cases including patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets, from 1913 to the present. The publisher stopped the sequence of volume numbers and ...

  9. Bayer's patent for blood thinner Xarelto invalid, UK ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/bayers-patent-blood-thinner...

    Bayer's patent covering its best-selling blood thinner Xarelto is invalid, London's High Court ruled on Friday in a blow to the German drugmaker. The company's blockbuster Xarelto drug generated ...