enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Inaccuracy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Inaccuracy

    The content guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources makes these statements: The reliability of a source depends on context. Each source must be carefully weighed to judge whether it is reliable for the statement being made and is the best such source for that context.

  3. Wikipedia : When sources are wrong

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:When_sources_are...

    Wikipedia:Neutral point of view gives us guidance for when sources disagree on matters of opinion, like if some sources characterize something as a language and some characterize it as a dialect. Wikipedia:No original research , and a litany of essays such as Wikipedia:The Truth , give us guidance for when we personally disagree with a source ...

  4. Wikipedia:Accuracy dispute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Accuracy_dispute

    If you see an article that may be inaccurate, you should do the following: Correct it yourself if you can. Add citations to reliable sources to verify the information. If the neutrality of the content is in question, see Wikipedia:NPOV dispute for more details about how to handle it. If only a few statements seem inaccurate, see Disputed statement.

  5. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/...

    The following presents a non-exhaustive list of sources whose reliability and use on Wikipedia are frequently discussed. This list summarizes prior consensus and consolidates links to the most in-depth and recent discussions from the reliable sources noticeboard and elsewhere on Wikipedia.

  6. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view). If no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.

  7. Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Potentially...

    The guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources gives general advice on what is and isn't a reliable source; this essay aims to analyse specific examples of sources that might initially appear to be reliable, yet may not be. If in doubt about a source, discuss this at the reliable sources noticeboard.

  8. List of Wikipedia controversies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedia...

    John Seigenthaler, an American journalist, was the subject of a defamatory Wikipedia hoax article in May 2005. The hoax raised questions about the reliability of Wikipedia and other websites with user-generated content. Since the launch of Wikipedia in 2001, the site has faced several controversies. Wikipedia's open-editing model, under which anyone can edit most articles, has led to concerns ...

  9. Wikipedia:Inaccuracies in Wikipedia namespace - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Inaccuracies_in...

    And while Wikipedia itself does not meet the definition of a "reliable source" for articles and there is not likely to be an "outside authority" regarding, e.g. AfDs on schools, there is no reason why Wikipedia cannot be a reliable source for itself in the Wikipedia namespace except that some editors might not care to take the time to do it ...