enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Falsifiability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability

    The law is falsifiable and much more useful from a scientific point of view, if the method to detect the neutrino is specified. [42] Maxwell said that most scientific laws are metaphysical statements of this kind, [ 43 ] which, Popper said, need to be made more precise before they can be indirectly corroborated.

  3. Not even wrong - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong

    The phrase is generally attributed to the theoretical physicist Wolfgang Pauli, who was known for his colorful objections to incorrect or careless thinking. [2] [3]Rudolf Peierls documents an instance in which "a friend showed Pauli the paper of a young physicist which he suspected was not of great value but on which he wanted Pauli's views.

  4. Philosophical razor - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_razor

    Russell's teapot – Analogy formulated by Bertrand Russell to illustrate that the burden of proof lies upon a person making empirically unfalsifiable claims; Occam's razor § Anti-razors; Zebra (medicine) – Exotic diagnosis in medicine which is usually unnecessary and wrong

  5. Fallibilism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallibilism

    The founder of critical rationalism: Karl Popper. In the mid-twentieth century, several important philosophers began to critique the foundations of logical positivism.In his work The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1934), Karl Popper, the founder of critical rationalism, argued that scientific knowledge grows from falsifying conjectures rather than any inductive principle and that ...

  6. Wikipedia:Falsifiability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Falsifiability

    Informally, a statement is falsifiable if some observation might show it to be false. For example, "All swans are white" is falsifiable because "Here is a black swan" shows it to be false. The apparent contradiction seen in the case of a true but falsifiable statement disappears once we know the technical definition.

  7. Critical rationalism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_rationalism

    They are either falsifiable and thus empirical (in a very broad sense), or not falsifiable and thus non-empirical. Those claims to knowledge that are potentially falsifiable can then be admitted to the body of empirical science, and then further differentiated according to whether they are retained or are later actually falsified.

  8. Testability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testability

    Testability is a primary aspect of science [1] and the scientific method.There are two components to testability: Falsifiability or defeasibility, which means that counterexamples to the hypothesis are logically possible.

  9. Foolishness - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foolishness

    Stultitia (folly) was shown as the opposite of Prudentia . Foolishness is the inability or failure to act following reason due to lack of judgment, stupidity, stubbornness, etc. [1] The things such as impulsivity and/or influences may affect a person's ability to make reasonable decisions.