enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. File Allocation Table - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Allocation_Table

    The benefit of FAT16 was the use of smaller clusters, making disk usage more efficient, particularly for large numbers of files only a few hundred bytes in size. As MS-DOS 3.0 formatted all 16 MB-32 MB partitions in the FAT16 format, a 20 MB hard disk formatted under MS-DOS 3.0 was not accessible by MS-DOS 2.0. [27]

  3. Design of the FAT file system - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_of_the_FAT_file_system

    The first byte of the relocated FAT in logical sector 0 was used to determine the disk's capacity. 640 KB boot disks began with a miniature ADFS file system containing the boot loader, followed by a single FAT. [35] [36] Also, the 640 KB format differed by using physical CHS sector numbers starting with 0 (not 1, as common) and incrementing ...

  4. FAT filesystem and Linux - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FAT_filesystem_and_Linux

    All of the Linux filesystem drivers support all three FAT types, namely FAT12, FAT16 and FAT32.Where they differ is in the provision of support for long filenames, beyond the 8.3 filename structure of the original FAT filesystem format, and in the provision of Unix file semantics that do not exist as standard in the FAT filesystem format such as file permissions. [1]

  5. Comparison of file systems - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems

    FAT16: IBM, Microsoft: 1984 PC DOS 3.0, MS-DOS 3.0: MFS: Apple: 1984 System 1: Elektronika BK tape format NPO "Scientific centre" (now Sitronics) 1985 Vilnius Basic, BK monitor program HFS: Apple: 1985 System 2.1: Amiga OFS: Metacomco for Commodore: 1985 Amiga OS: GEMDOS: Digital Research: 1985 Atari TOS: NWFS: Novell: 1985 NetWare 286: High ...

  6. List of default file systems - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_default_file_systems

    FAT12, but logically format incompatible with MS-DOS/PC DOS. 1981: PC DOS 1.0: FAT12: 1982: MS-DOS 1.25: FAT12: 1982: Commodore 64 / 1541: Commodore DOS (CBM DOS) 1984: PC DOS 3.0 / MS-DOS 3.0: FAT16: 1984: Classic Mac OS: Macintosh File System (MFS) 1985: Atari TOS: Modified FAT12: 1985: Classic Mac OS: Hierarchical File System (HFS) 1987 ...

  7. File system - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_system

    The FAT12 and FAT16 file systems had a limit on the number of entries in the root directory of the file system and had restrictions on the maximum size of FAT-formatted disks or partitions. FAT32 addresses the limitations in FAT12 and FAT16, except for the file size limit of close to 4 GB, but it remains limited compared to NTFS.

  8. AOL

    search.aol.com

    The search engine that helps you find exactly what you're looking for. Find the most relevant information, video, images, and answers from all across the Web.

  9. Disk partitioning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disk_partitioning

    The FAT16 and FAT32 file systems have made use of a number of partition type codes due to the limits of various DOS and Windows OS versions. Though a Linux operating system may recognize a number of different file systems ( ext4 , ext3 , ext2 , ReiserFS , etc.), they have all consistently used the same partition type code: 0x83 ( Linux native ...