enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Unpaired word - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unpaired_word

    An unpaired word is one that, according to the usual rules of the language, would appear to have a related word but does not. [1] Such words usually have a prefix or suffix that would imply that there is an antonym , with the prefix or suffix being absent or opposite.

  3. Accidental gap - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accidental_gap

    A morphological gap is the absence of a word that could exist given the morphological rules of a language, including its affixes. [1] For example, in English a deverbal noun can be formed by adding either the suffix -al or -(t)ion to certain verbs (typically words from Latin through Anglo-Norman French or Old French).

  4. Opposite - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposite

    An example is "inept," which seems to be "in-" + *"ept," although the word "ept" itself does not exist [citation needed]. Such words are known as unpaired words. Opposites may be viewed as a special type of incompatibility. [1] Words that are incompatible create the following type of entailment (where X is a given word and Y is a different word ...

  5. Why Do Languages Have Gendered Words?

    www.aol.com/why-languages-gendered-words...

    English does have some words that are associated with gender, but it does not have a true grammatical gender system. "English used to have grammatical gender. We started losing it as a language ...

  6. Opposite (semantics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contrariety

    For example, the word undevout appears in Webster's dictionary of 1828, while the pattern of non-person could conceivably be extended to non-platypus. Conversely, some words appear to be a prefixed form of an opposite, but the opposite term does not exist, such as inept, which appears to be in-+ *ept; such a word is known as an unpaired word.

  7. Talk:Unpaired word - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Unpaired_word

    Which is indeed the nature of many unpaired words, except that normally the pairing is intuitively plausible (even if etymologically invalid). — Smjg 00:02, 7 October 2011 (UTC) See my note at the end of samples — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.192.1.67 17:55, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

  8. AOL

    www.aol.com/news/40-words-didn-t-exist-223358047...

    AOL

  9. Bound and free morphemes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bound_and_free_morphemes

    Affixes may be inflectional, indicating how a certain word relates to other words in a larger phrase, or derivational, changing either the part of speech or the actual meaning of a word. [6] Most roots in English are free morphemes (e.g. examin-in examination, which can occur in isolation: examine), but others are bound (e.g. bio-in biology).