enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Bible errata - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_errata

    "Sin On Bible", from 1716: Jeremiah 31:34 [25] [26] reads "sin on more" rather than "sin no more". Heading for the "The Parable of the Vineyard" in a copy of the "Vinegar Bible" "Vinegar Bible", from 1717: J. Baskett, Clarendon Press: The chapter heading for Luke 20 reads "The Parable of the Vinegar" instead of "The Parable of the Vineyard ...

  3. Criticism of the Bible - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Bible

    Specific collections of biblical writings, such as the Hebrew Bible and Christian Bibles, are considered sacred and authoritative by their respective faith groups. [11] The limits of the canon were effectively set by the proto-orthodox churches from the 1st throughout the 4th century; however, the status of the scriptures has been a topic of scholarly discussion in the later churches.

  4. Biblical inerrancy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_inerrancy

    Here the Bible is seen as a unique witness to the people and deeds that do make up the Word of God. However, it is a wholly human witness. [93] All books of the Bible were written by human beings. Thus, whether the Bible is—in whole or in part [94] —the Word of God is not clear. However, some argue that the Bible can still be construed as ...

  5. Historicity of the Bible - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_the_Bible

    The Bible reports that Jehoshaphat, a contemporary of Ahab, offered manpower and horses for the northern kingdom's wars against the Arameans. He strengthened his relationship with the northern kingdom by arranging a diplomatic marriage: the Israelite princess Athaliah, sister or daughter of King Ahab, married Jehoram, the son of Jehoshaphat (2 ...

  6. Biblical criticism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_criticism

    Modern Biblical criticism (as opposed to pre-Modern criticism) is the use of critical analysis to understand and explain the Bible without appealing to the supernatural. . During the eighteenth century, when it began as historical-biblical criticism, it was based on two distinguishing characteristics: (1) the scientific concern to avoid dogma and bias by applying a neutral, non-sectarian ...

  7. Expert claims 'recent discoveries' prove historical accuracy ...

    www.aol.com/news/2016-09-23-expert-claims-recent...

    Experts seemingly constantly debate the accuracy of the bible, with some arguing that Jesus of Nazareth was never Resurrected, or even ever existed. Well, Dr. Brant Pitre, ...

  8. Errors in the Bible - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Errors_in_the_bible

    Errors in the Bible may refer to: Bible errata, accidents in printing, copying, and translating; Criticism of the Bible regarding its factual accuracy, ethics, or internal inconsistencies; Biblical inerrancy, a disputed doctrine asserting the Bible contains no errors

  9. Internal consistency of the Bible - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_consistency_of...

    An American Christian family's Bible dating to 1859. Disputes regarding the internal consistency and textual integrity of the Bible have a long history.. Classic texts that discuss questions of inconsistency from a critical secular perspective include the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus by Baruch Spinoza, the Dictionnaire philosophique of Voltaire, the Encyclopédie of Denis Diderot and The Age ...