enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Champerty and maintenance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Champerty_and_maintenance

    In New South Wales, champerty and maintenance were abolished by the Maintenance, Champerty and Barratry Abolition Act 1993. [11] In Victoria, champerty and maintenance was abolished as a tort by section 32 of the Wrongs Act 1958, [12] and as a crime by section 332A of the Crimes Act 1958. [13]

  3. Barratry (common law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barratry_(common_law)

    Barratry (/ ˈ b ær ə t r i / BARR-ə-tree, from Old French barat ("deceit, trickery")) is a legal term that, at common law, described a criminal offense committed by people who are overly officious in instigating or encouraging prosecution of groundless litigation, [1] or who bring repeated or persistent acts of litigation for the purposes of profit or harassment.

  4. List of Superfund sites in Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Superfund_sites_in...

    This is a list of Superfund sites in Texas designated under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) environmental law. The CERCLA federal law of 1980 authorized the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to create a list of polluted locations requiring a long-term response to clean up hazardous material contaminations. [1]

  5. Common law offence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law_offence

    Under the criminal law of Australia the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Commonwealth) abolished all common law offences at the federal level. [1] The Australian Capital Territory, the Northern Territory, Queensland, Tasmania and Western Australia have also abolished common law offences, but they still apply in New South Wales, South Australia and Victoria.

  6. Harrison v. NAACP - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrison_v._NAACP

    Harrison v. NAACP, 360 U.S. 167 (1959), is a 6-to-3 ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States which held that the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia should have abstained from deciding the constitutionality of three barratry, champerty, and maintenance laws in the state of Virginia until state courts had had a reasonable chance to construe them.

  7. NAACP v. Button - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAACP_v._Button

    NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415 (1963), is a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States which held that the reservation of jurisdiction by a federal district court did not bar the U.S. Supreme Court from reviewing a state court's ruling, and also overturned certain laws enacted by the state of Virginia in 1956 as part of the Stanley Plan and massive resistance, as violating the First and ...

  8. My great aunt, 82, is drowning in $80K of credit card debt ...

    www.aol.com/finance/great-aunt-82-drowning-80k...

    Your great aunt owes $80,000 in credit card debt along with about $15,000 in missed timeshare payments. As a concerned family member, you may be wondering how to help her.

  9. Law of Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Texas

    [2] [5] In 1963, the Texas legislature began a major revision of the 1925 Texas statutory classification scheme, and as of 1989 over half of the statutory law had been arranged under the recodification process. [2] The de facto codifications are Vernon's Texas Statutes Annotated and Vernon's Texas Codes Annotated, commonly known as Vernon's.