enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Rationalizable strategy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalizable_strategy

    The expected payoff for playing strategy ⁠ 1 / 2 ⁠ Y + ⁠ 1 / 2 ⁠ Z must be greater than the expected payoff for playing pure strategy X, assigning ⁠ 1 / 2 ⁠ and ⁠ 1 / 2 ⁠ as tester values. The argument for mixed strategy dominance can be made if there is at least one mixed strategy that allows for dominance.

  3. Risk dominance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_dominance

    Risk dominance and payoff dominance are two related refinements of the Nash equilibrium (NE) solution concept in game theory, defined by John Harsanyi and Reinhard Selten.A Nash equilibrium is considered payoff dominant if it is Pareto superior to all other Nash equilibria in the game. 1 When faced with a choice among equilibria, all players would agree on the payoff dominant equilibrium since ...

  4. Strategic dominance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_dominance

    On the other hand, weakly dominated strategies may be part of Nash equilibria. For instance, consider the payoff matrix pictured at the right. Strategy C weakly dominates strategy D. Consider playing C: If one's opponent plays C, one gets 1; if one's opponent plays D, one gets 0. Compare this to D, where one gets 0 regardless.

  5. Coordination game - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coordination_game

    Using the payoff matrix in Figure 1, a game is an anti-coordination game if B > A and C > D for row-player 1 (with lowercase analogues b > d and c > a for column-player 2). {Down, Left} and {Up, Right} are the two pure Nash equilibria.

  6. Normal-form game - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal-form_game

    A payoff function for a player is a mapping from the cross-product of players' strategy spaces to that player's set of payoffs (normally the set of real numbers, where the number represents a cardinal or ordinal utility—often cardinal in the normal-form representation) of a player, i.e. the payoff function of a player takes as its input a ...

  7. Total Domination Nuclear Strategy: A Getting Started Guide - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2011-08-27-total-domination...

    Total Domination: Nuclear Strategy is a Facebook game developed by Plarium that puts you in the shoes of an army commander in an intergalactic war. Gamezebo's Total Domination: Nuclear Strategy ...

  8. Cooperative game theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative_game_theory

    The excess of for a coalition is the quantity (); that is, the gain that players in coalition can obtain if they withdraw from the grand coalition under payoff and instead take the payoff (). The nucleolus of v {\displaystyle v} is the imputation for which the vector of excesses of all coalitions (a vector in R 2 N {\displaystyle \mathbb {R ...

  9. Stag hunt - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stag_hunt

    Formally, a stag hunt is a game with two pure strategy Nash equilibria—one that is risk dominant and another that is payoff dominant. The payoff matrix in Figure 1 illustrates a generic stag hunt, where > >. In addition to the pure strategy Nash equilibria there is one mixed strategy Nash equilibrium. This equilibrium depends on the payoffs ...