enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of cognitive biases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases

    Social cryptomnesia, a failure by people and society in general to remember the origin of a change, in which people know that a change has occurred in society, but forget how this change occurred; that is, the steps that were taken to bring this change about, and who took these steps. This has led to reduced social credit towards the minorities ...

  3. Inclination (ethics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclination_(ethics)

    Aristotle "holds it to be the mark of a good person to take pleasure in moral action," or what one wants to do. Immanuel Kant made a study of whether inclination is of the highest moral worth, and objected to Aristotle's analysis, reasoning that "it is the person who acts from the motive of duty in the teeth of contrary inclination who shows an ...

  4. Occam's razor - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor

    In philosophy, Occam's razor (also spelled Ockham's razor or Ocham's razor; Latin: novacula Occami) is the problem-solving principle that recommends searching for explanations constructed with the smallest possible set of elements.

  5. There's A Right And A Wrong Way To Reject Someone ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/heres-exactly-first-date...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. Two wrongs don't make a right - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_wrongs_don't_make_a_right

    Conservative journalist Victor Lasky wrote in his book It Didn't Start With Watergate that, while two wrongs do not make a right, if a set of immoral things are done and left unprosecuted, this creates a legal precedent. Thus, people who do the same wrongs in the future should rationally expect to get away with them as well.

  7. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics:_Inventing_Right...

    The argument from disagreement, also known as the argument from relativity, first observes that there is a lot of intractable moral disagreement: people disagree about what is right and what is wrong. [3] Mackie argues that the best explanation of this is that right and wrong are invented, not objective truths.

  8. Do Narcissists Know What They’re Doing? Psychologists Share ...

    www.aol.com/narcissists-know-doing-psychologists...

    One of the most common questions people have when dealing with narcissistic behavior is whether or not narcissists truly understand the impact of their actions and what they are doing. According ...

  9. J. L. Austin - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._L._Austin

    Austin pointed out that we use language to do things as well as to assert things, and that the utterance of a statement like "I promise to do so-and-so" is best understood as doing something—here, making a promise—rather than making an assertion about anything; hence the title of one of his best-known works, How to Do Things with Words (1955).