enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. En banc - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/En_banc

    [6] The Ninth Circuit, with 29 judges, uses this procedure, and its en banc court consists of 11 judges. Theoretically, the Ninth Circuit can render en banc decisions with all 29 judges participating; such a hearing would overrule a prior 11-judge en banc hearing on the same case. Though no rule exists barring a party from requesting such a ...

  3. Washington v. Trump - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_v._Trump

    The day after the denial of stay, the 9th Circuit ordered the parties to submit supplemental briefs on whether the motion should be reheard en banc. [59] The order was issued at the request of an unidentified judge of the Ninth Circuit to be voted on by all 25 active judges (though, if successful, a rehearing would be by a panel of 11 judges).

  4. United States v. Weitzenhoff - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Weitzenhoff

    Several judges on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals took this opportunity to collaborate on a dissenting opinion against the decisions to deny a rehearing en banc. [27] Circuit Judge Andrew Kleinfeld authored the legal opinion for this dissent, arguing that imposing criminal liability in this case would deter others from useful careers in the ...

  5. City of Grants Pass v. Johnson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Grants_Pass_v._Johnson

    In June 2023, the Ninth Circuit denied a petition for an en banc rehearing by the entire Ninth Circuit, amending its opinion with a response to Judge Diarmuid O'Scannlain's arguments against the denial. O'Scannlain argued against creating a circuit split from the Eleventh Circuit's decision in Joel v.

  6. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wal-Mart_Stores,_Inc._v._Dukes

    Walmart again filed for a rehearing en banc. On February 13, 2009, the Ninth Circuit granted Walmart's petition for rehearing en banc on the class action certification. [8] As a result, the December 2007 Ninth Circuit opinion was no longer effective. [9] On March 24, 2009 a panel of eleven Ninth Circuit judges, led by Chief Judge Alex Kozinski ...

  7. Sevcik v. Sandoval - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sevcik_v._Sandoval

    Sevcik v. Sandoval is the lead case that successfully challenged Nevada's denial of same-sex marriage as mandated by the state's constitution and statutory law.The plaintiffs' complaint was initially filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada on April 10, 2012, on behalf of several couples denied marriage licenses.

  8. En Banc Review Sought for 3rd Circuit's Decision on Court ...

    www.aol.com/news/en-banc-review-sought-3rd...

    Delaware Gov. John Carney has asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit to rehear en banc the case that struck provisions of the Delaware Constitution mandating balance between the ...

  9. Nordyke v. King - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordyke_v._King

    On May 18, 2009, an anonymous judge of the Ninth Circuit called for briefing from both sides on whether the case should be reheard en banc. [5] On July 29, 2009, the Ninth Circuit decided to rehear this case en banc, thereby vacating both parts of the April 20 ruling. [6] [7] [8] After rehearing the case on September 24, 2009, the Ninth Circuit ...